Obama forces a General to change his Congressional Testimony

[377OHMS]

Uhoh.

More trouble for Obama. Is a pattern emerging?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...e-pressure-general-shelton-to-help-donor.html

Evidently Obama exerted force to make a USAF General change his testimony to congress regarding an Obama campaign donor.

Isn't that illegal?

I've got 10-bucks that says this schmuck is facing impeachment hearings by Spring 2012. Thats 10 crisp new US dollars or a pack of Juicyfruit, whichever is more valuable.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

I doubt you have 10 bucks but good luck waiting on that impeachment

 

[Max E.]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

I doubt you have 10 bucks but good luck waiting on that impeachment

Maybe he can borrow the 10 bucks from Obamas campaign fund since he saved a trillion dollars for this election.

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

.This is a 2 person contest and all Obama has to do is convince most people that the other guy is worse.With the Obama media and a 700 billion-1 trillion dollar war chest he is likely to do that as seen below

 

[DemZad]

Quote from 377OHMS:

Uhoh.

More trouble for Obama. Is a pattern emerging?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...e-pressure-general-shelton-to-help-donor.html

Evidently Obama exerted force to make a USAF General change his testimony to congress regarding an Obama campaign donor.

Isn't that illegal?

I've got 10-bucks that says this schmuck is facing impeachment hearings by Spring 2012. Thats 10 crisp new US dollars or a pack of Juicyfruit, whichever is more valuable.

If Congress isn't going to impeach him over Libya, I'm afraid our only hope is if he has improper relations with an intern.

 

[377OHMS]

Quote from DAS Trader:

If Congress isn't going to impeach him over Libya, I'm afraid our only hope is if he has improper relations with an intern.

I don't know, Clinton survived that scenario with little trouble.

For there to be real trouble there must be money or influence peddling involved. Obama seems to be dabbling in both.

 

[DemZad]

Quote from 377OHMS:

I don't know, Clinton survived that scenario with little trouble.

For there to be real trouble there must be money or influence peddling involved. Obama seems to be dabbling in both.

True, Clinton survived the impeachment proceedings...but it completely defanged the rest of his presidency, making him a lame duck. I'd settle for that at this point...at least he couldn't do any more damage.

 

[pspr]

Obama has been rewarding donors with favors going way back to his days in Chicago. It should be illegal but to some degree every politician does it. I think Obama has taken it to a new level and in many areas is in violation of the law. Does this fall under the definition of "....treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors?” We'll see.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from pspr:

... Does this fall under the definition of "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors?” We'll see.

Almost certainly, to me the question is does the Senate have the balls to do their fucking job in this regard? Personally I doubt.

 

[Trader666]

You're forgetting that everyone's not on welfare like you.

Quote from IQ Forty Seven:

I doubt you have 10 bucks

 

[pspr]

Quote from Lucrum:

Almost certainly, to me the question is does the Senate have the balls to do their fucking job in this regard? Personally I doubt.

Boehner and Cantor know that even if they Impeach Obama that the Senate won't prosecute unless the crimes are really severe. You saw how they let Clinton off.