define please for the ignoramuses out here of which I am one.
Obama even more socialist than Mao tse Tung, how can we as a nation tolerate this?
- Thread starter MohdSalleh
- Start date
define please for the ignoramuses out here of which I am one.
Apparently none of the resident ET retards realize we were already Socialist way before Obama.
The bias being towards Republican Corporate Socialism.
btw, for the resident retards, Corporatist Socialism is also known as Fascism.
The bias being towards Republican Corporate Socialism.
btw, for the resident retards, Corporatist Socialism is also known as Fascism.
Google is your friend
Obama has stonewalled attempts to learn facts about his past.... a big effort and at significant expense. Why would he do that unless he has something to hide?
He's probably an American, but there is question as to whether he's a "natural born" citizen, as required to be president. There's question that if he were "natural born", that he might have given up his US citizenship for a freebie education in Indonesia(?) some place. If that's true, he's not eligible to be president.... and he stonewalls the disclosure which would tell the story one way or another.
Seems peoples' suspicions have merit. He's not a legit president in my eyes until he discloses... and even if he did that, I'd still think him bad for America based upon his policies.
But that's just me. I didn't like GWB, either.
definition would tend to describe the libertarians of today, I like it.
The ability to turn on a PC and post fake Kenyan birth certificates passes as the definition for highly educated for the average neanderthal
The thread is veering off topic.
America was Socialist way before Obama. We have been ruled by Corporate Socialists aka Republican Fascists for the better part of 3 decades.
The OP needs to get his facts straight.
The thread is veering off topic.
America was Socialist way before Obama. We have been ruled by Corporate Socialists aka Republican Fascists for the better part of 3 decades.
The OP needs to get his facts straight.
The modern political "liberal" (US) is actually not liberal at all except for socially. They champion the destruction of all moral/religous/cultural values and judgements. So in that regard they are very liberal.
They are strongly opposed to capitalism, the right to bear arms and freedom of speach.
They use ulterior causes such
"global warming"
"racism"
"fairness"
"healthcare"
"politcal correctness"
in order to advance their agenda and redistribute wealth.
Why would he do otherwise except to make the fringe kooks lose their collective minds and be preoccupied with nonsense?
It's fairly simpleton strategy actually.
It's fairly simpleton strategy actually.