Obama denies any video showing Michelle 'whitey' rant...

Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

"we" WTF is we?

Hmm, we is a group of people to include many who are unrelated.

When I think Klan, I'm here:

Definitions of klan on the Web:

---------------------------------
Ku Klux Klan: a secret society of white Southerners in the United States; was formed in the 19th century to resist the emancipation of slaves ...
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

Klan (pl. clan) is a Polish soap opera, one of the first to come into creation. It has been filmed since 1997 and is currently still running. Past actresses include Joanna ¯ó³kowska and Jagoda Stach.

--------------------------------

Neither of which applies to my situation. :)
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Again, you are bringing race into the equation by suggesting that if Obama were white he would not be in the position he is in.

Let's say that is true and that the democratic party is racist and chose Obama over Hillary because she was a white woman.

Really, you think that is the likely case?

Besides, what does that have to do with promoting John McCain?

The reality is that the democratic party hated Hillary Clinton more than they loved Obama, and Obama initially did appeal to higher values like hope, he did inspire people (not me, I think he is a confidence man just like any other politician)...rather than the tired old fear card that you are playing.

In the end, you continue to focus on race. That makes your focus on his race valid?

Why can't you just keep on posting the glory of John McCain?

Every time you bring up the issue of race, simply demonstrates your focus on race, and if you were colorblind, you wouldn't see a black presidential candidate, a bi-racial candidate, you would just see a democratic candidate.

There are plenty of ideological issues that republicans can make a case for in their support of McCain, and plenty to make a case against Obama when it comes to Obama...but the race card should not be one of them...unless you are trying to play the race card in attempt to appeal to the voting public that do make hiring decision (like hiring the new president) on the basis of race.

Until you drop it entirely, you are acting like a racist, or worse, a republican operative who is trying to influence voters with the race card.



I do recall, back when Bush appointed Roberts or Alito to the Supreme Court, there was <b>only one</b> ET member who became steadfastly fixated on the justice's race. Everyone else was focused on the actual issues.

I suppose you'd readily condemn that ET member as a racist, would you not?
 
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

It's interesting that among traders there are virtually no McCain threads at all. There is only one candidate.

This is '96 Clinton vs. Dole (minus Perot) all over again.

I decided today that Obama can't win. It will be Michelle Obama's comment about "this is the first time I've been proud of America". Ultimately this is a racist nation and she gave the "white" people" something to hang their hats on to proclaim that Obama is anti white and anti American etc. Their campaign needs to find a way to counteract that statement or all will be lost.

funny....Obama is equally white as he is black
 
Fixated on white male Catholics, five of them appointed (not elected) for life to the bench?

Why would anyone do that?

Clearly five white male Catholics are fully representative of the electorate at large...especially when they are appointed for life...not elected.

What is funny is that these jurists are not likely to do anything about the drug laws and/or personal freedom that some are in favor of...

Amazing how fixating and blinding personal resentments can be to someone who claims to be focused solely on the "telling the truth."

As if the truth of their motive were to get at truth, rather than try to grind their own axe. Nothing is a greater confirmation of this reality than the repetitive use of an essential ad hominem fallacy. It appears routinely just as day following the night.

After all this time, some still don't get it, do they?

They think they are winning, but by engaging over and over and over again with the fallacious personal approach, they keep on losing where it really counts, where it really matters, where people really keep score on the inside chalk board of their own mind, stuck forever without an eraser dumbly looking at the shattering loss...all in some primitive attempt to regain control where it was lost so long ago.

Hate binds just as much as love, and that which binds a man does not yield him freedom...something Libertarians claim to cherish above all else.

Me thinks they better free their mind instead...

Quote from Rearden Metal:

I do recall, back when Bush appointed Roberts or Alito to the Supreme Court, there was <b>only one</b> ET member who became steadfastly fixated on the justice's race. Everyone else was focused on the actual issues.

I suppose you'd readily condemn that ET member as a racist, would you not?
 
The funny piece to me is he doesn't feel that way.
Quote from RichardRimes:

I decided today that Obama can't win. It will be Michelle Obama's comment about "this is the first time I've been proud of America". Ultimately this is a racist nation and she gave the "white" people" something to hang their hats on to proclaim that Obama is anti white and anti American etc. Their campaign needs to find a way to counteract that statement or all will be lost.

funny....Obama is equally white as he is black
 
Quote from canyonman00:

The funny piece to me is he doesn't feel that way.

I'll take your word for it, you've been around him. But did you notice his wife when you were around her? She definitely looks to be an america hater.

It would've been hard to imagine back in the Clinton days that there would be a first lady that could draw more ire than hillary, but I know that the thought of this woman being first lady sends shivers up and down the spines of many a people.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Fixated on white male Catholics, five of them appointed (not elected) for life to the bench?

Why would anyone do that?

Clearly five white male Catholics are fully representative of the electorate at large...especially when they are appointed for life...not elected.

*Note to self: Insert futile taunts here to complete the post, chug entire liter of Gray Goose, brutally kick helpless little puppy, vigorously masturbate to old Punky Brewster reruns, fall asleep in a puddle containing at least three different personal bodily fluids to complete the evening.*

Very interesting... So, race was the <b>central issue</b> regarding the SCOTUS appointments of Roberts & Alito... Yet somehow, race is a complete <b>non-issue</b> regarding the candidacy of the first black man in history to have a real shot at the U.S. presidency- A man also accused of regularly attending racist hate-rallies for the past 20 years. Riiiight...:p LoZZZer :p

I thought your whole bit was NOT to make it completely obvious that you're only here to troll!
 
Back
Top