Quote from piezoe:
Paul is certainly the only interesting Republican candidate and has large support among independents and those fed up with both parties. I believe the Republican party could have been re-energized by returning to its historic roots with a candidate like Paul, but couldn't win of course. Never the less it would have made for a very interesting campaign and perhaps signaled a turning point in U.S. politics. If your going to lose anyway why not go with a candidate that will raise real issues about the direction the country is moving in and at least make for an intriguing campaign.
It's a real mistake to think that Obama is responsible for current problems. He is not. And in reality there is not much difference in either party. Of course on social issues the parties differ. But both are leading the country over a cliff. Perhaps one party a little faster than the other. That's all.
In response to your first paragraph. That's an easy one. Both political parties have NO interest in discussing the "real issues". It's more important to "paper over" all of the cracks in the facade. If any meaningful discourse caught traction, it would send too many otherwise happy lemmings into the rabbit hole.
Second paragraph. That's a cop out. Each successive administration has a limited opportunity to take a stand and reverse course.
