You'll never convince me that Clinton doesn't deserve every bit of criticism being leveled at her. She's a corrupt hack through and through. That said, she's a predictable hack, and predictable is looking to be the safe play considering the alternative. Evidently the best way to damage Trump is to simply stand back and let him talk. He stays on the crazy train and he's going to lose in an embarrassing way. Lose to someone that her own supporters will be holding their nose while they vote.And with good reason. Consider the discredited books written about her. Consider that Snopes and other fact checking groups probably have full-time staff dealing with bullshit wishful-thinking allegations about her. Consider that there have been, what, 8 investigations into Benghazi as Republicans look for ways to do Hillary in. However, when Reagan was president and the US embassy in Beirut was attacked in 1983 leaving far more dead, there was only one (legitimate) investigation. It was not politicized. The Right hates the Clintons and there is a rich history of their making all kinds of shit up about them, hoping that something will eventually stick. Consider the e-mail brouhaha and the fact that no one questioned the use of private e-mail in the State Department during the 8 years of the W administration; the matter never even came up.
Meanwhile, the best way to do damage to Trump is to simply report the unvarnished truth.
. However, when Reagan was president and the US embassy in Beirut was attacked in 1983 leaving far more dead, there was only one (legitimate) investigation. It was not politicized.
You'll never convince me that Clinton doesn't deserve every bit of criticism being leveled at her. She's a corrupt hack through and through. That said, she's a predictable hack, and predictable is looking to be the safe play considering the alternative. Evidently the best way to damage Trump is to simply stand back and let him talk. He stays on the crazy train and he's going to lose in an embarrassing way. Lose to someone that her own supporters will be holding their nose while they vote.
Except for the small matter that most of the attacks against her are unsubstantiated and based more on innuendo and "feeling" (i.e., wishful thinking) than fact. Very little that is thrown at her stands up to scrutiny, except to those fully invested in a preconceived narrative.You'll never convince me that Clinton doesn't deserve every bit of criticism being leveled at her.
Seriously, either post a link where she is quoted accused family members of being "liars" or STFU about it already. Constantly repeating it and clicking your heels doesn't make it so.defame the family members on national TV as liars.
Seriously, either post a link about this or STFU about it already.
Link, Dorothy.She is saying they are lying
Even her own supporters know she is lying, about this, about the emails, about the Clinton slush fund, etc etc. They just don't give a damn because power is more important to them than integrity or the country.
Well, to be fair, it's a little deeper than that. This guy takes the term "Ugly American" to a whole new level. Now I'm all for in your face anti PC straight talk. I've used plenty of "colorful" language myself to make that point, but I'm not running for president. If I were to seek that lofty status I would like to think I'd have the common sense to clean up my act. He has been, and is being told repeatedly to do just that, and the people doing the telling are strong supporters of his. High level supporters. Trump seems unable and/or unwilling to do that. I find that disturbing and quite frankly, unsettling.Very disappointing. You'd let Hillary appoint three Supreme Court justices because Trump doesn't choose his words as carefully as a career pol?