Obama Approval Rating 68 Percent,highest approval in 20 years

Quote from Thunderdog:

Nice try, reg. The rather unprecedented vehemence with which some posters lash out against Obama, with or without basis, is perhaps just a tad too visceral and continuous for my taste. Therefore, I will continue to interpret it my way, and you can nod and wink with the best of them as you please.
More...


Hypocrisy%20Meter.gif


:eek:
 
Quote from reg:

This was what AAA stated in his previous post:



What he stated was based on facts - Paul Krugman did criticize Obama's economic policies, five CIA chiefs did criticize Obama for his decisions affecting homeland security, and Janet Napolitano's department did circulate a memo warning about returning Middle East vets as being at risk of turning into domestic terrorists.
Your response to his post was this:



I did not see any hint of a personal attack in AAA's post, but you as usual not only resorted to an ad hominem assault against him but again conveniently flashed out the race card to support your lack of an argument.
This is a pattern I have observed regarding your posts in the P & R forum - instantly label a fellow poster a racist if that person disagrees with any of Obama's decisions or policies. You seem to have a very queer kind of devotion and affinity for Obama, which I find quite puzzling since he is not even your president as you yoourself are not an American citizen.
If you need more proof and are in the mood to further embarrass yourself as to how you resort to personal attacks instead of presenting valid arguments, I'd be happy to dig out those posts for you. Just let me know.
More...
Yeah, it is unfortunate. I thought Tdog might be one of those rare liberals who actually are reasonable and are willing to admit when the other side has a good point and they have made a mistake, but it seems he is instead just another run-of-the-mill, Obama-can-do-no-wrong, blame-everything-on-Bush, resort-to-ad-hominem-when-presented-with-facts-that-destroy-your-argument Canadian with an unnatural affinity for our CIC.

The torture thread is another example of his style of dodging questions and facts and resorting to ad hominem.

At least he sees the resident pedophile troll for what it is, though, so he has that going for him...
 
Quote from reg:

Nice dodge, Tdoggy. But the "rather unprecedented vehemence with which some posters lash out....with or without basis" are coming from people like you in this forum. If you need further proof, reread AAA's post and your immediate reaction to his post. Can you spot the difference? Or are you going to continue with your personal attacks and justify them by conveniently flashing the race card again and again?
More...
Your artful selectivity continues to impress. Your one-sidedness will invariably not go unnoticed or unappreciated by your peers. While you have unearthed a pattern in my posting, you predictably failed to recognize that my pattern is essentially BASED on, and in response to, the pattern blazed by AAA and those of his ilk. How unsurprising that this little tidbit would escape you. AAA has defined himself serially, and yet here you are, Piecemeal Percy, scratching your head.

Consider the nod and wink received.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Your artful selectivity continues to impress. Your one-sidedness will invariably not go unnoticed or unappreciated by your peers. While you have unearthed a pattern in my posting, you predictably failed to recognize that my pattern is essentially BASED on, and in response to, the pattern blazed by AAA and those of his ilk. How unsurprising that this little tidbit would escape you. AAA has defined himself serially, and yet here you are, Piecemeal Percy, scratching your head.

Consider the nod and wink received.
More...

AAA made a post based on facts. You responded with a personal attack implying that he is a racist without addressing any of the points made in his post. You can dodge all you want, but those are the FACTS in this issue.
So, I would like to go back to my original question to you: is it your opinion that anyone who disagrees with Obama's policies is automatically a racist?
No need to be feminine cute with your responses, just an honest one will suffice. Or at least, try to address AAA's points without flashing the race card.
 
Quote from hapaboy:


At least he sees the resident pedophile troll for what it is, though, so he has that going for him...
More...

That is true - he just has to stop fantasizing about Barry.
 
Obama can be eating white babies in the White house and will still have a rating of 99%++++++++, press calling him superpresident, messiah,savior,etc:mad:
 
Quote from reg:

AAA made a post based on facts. You responded with a personal attack implying that he is a racist without addressing any of the points made in his post. You can dodge all you want, but those are the FACTS in this issue.
So, I would like to go back to my original question to you: is it your opinion that anyone who disagrees with Obama's policies is automatically a racist?
No need to be feminine cute with your responses, just an honest one will suffice. Or at least, try to address AAA's points without flashing the race card.
More...
As I noted earlier, AAA has defined himself serially. The sum of his posts tell his story quite nicely rather than any single post in isolation. Evidently, you share his "broader perspective." Since we all know what's what here, it is you who ought to curtail the cute stuff and stop hiding behind false skirts. Oh, and your sheet is on crooked.
 
Quote from reg:

So, I would like to go back to my original question to you:

is it your opinion that anyone who disagrees with Obama's policies is automatically a racist?
More...

I'll answer that one.
No, of course not.
Period.

But in the case of "AAA", it is clear that he is a whole lot more than just politically biased against President Obama.

Can you even find ONE SINGLE POST by him that agrees with how Obama has handled a given situation? He's been hammering away for 100 days straight with the same old "babbling" BS.

"AAA" was even HIGHLY critical of the way in which Obama handled the hostage situation of Captain Richard Phillips by the Somali pirates.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=160732&perpage=6&pagenumber=3

And when asked what he would do differently, "AAA" ran away like the Internet Coward that he is, without providing his own "solution" to the hostage situation.

The guy doesn't trade the financial markets for a living, yet spends a ton of time on ET with >10,500 posts. And yet he still hasn't answered the question posed to him back on April 14th about what he would have done differently to successfully rescue Captain Phillips.

Why is that???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top