Oanda - Add Your SCAM SCREENS Here

ssss, you're experience is limited because you have only ever traded demo competitions which are not representative of trading in a live market with real cash.
###########################

That is right about experience ,but not in all correct about demand in presentation in the real market


As you knew reward related to risk

Some contests with paper money offer by 0 real money risk
100 000 $ real money reward (in USA 1 ml n$ reward)

more of them in Germany through tax law

Price money are not taxed
####################

Exist low quantity of paper money contest winner
with price some 100 000 $ in Germany
Tax is not apply through law

In Germany some 10 persons

Did you knew a lot of persons from Elitetrader

100 000 member's ,which performed from 2000 -5000 $
real money risk 100 000 reward after tax(Germany more as 40%) in two month or in 12 month ,if you wish

If any person exist ( author is doubt) ,than risk in he#s
case to win 100 000 $ would more

2-5000 risk capital + commission (or spread +commission)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbIfBbdM9gU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eRISnDsQcA&feature=related
 
I suspect forestgirl and Ssssssss are the same person,or closely seated.

##################

False

forestgirl is from Polen

author from Hamburg

forestgirl have account by Oanda

ssss have no any real money account and not to plane
have real money account by spot fx market

forestgirl have children and wife

sss not

forestgril complain oanda

ssss essentialy complain spot forex market ideja of Milton
Friedman ( ssss is apologet of gold standart ,as was until 1970's)

From ssss point of view oanda is not worstest
fx spot broker ( all ,which use mt4 with high chance worster)

but not the best .


P.S. cabletrader wrote ...There's really no need to divide capital between 3 or 4 different brokers, it's pointless and just makes for extra administration.


Your problem Sir ,Exist of lot sucessfull investor/trader's
in USA and another countries ,which would say
essentialy the the same divide broker's and capital's
 
Quote from ssss:



P.S. cabletrader wrote ...There's really no need to divide capital between 3 or 4 different brokers, it's pointless and just makes for extra administration.


Your problem Sir ,Exist of lot sucessfull investor/trader's
in USA and another countries ,which would say
essentialy the the same divide broker's and capital's

Why, what are the benefits?
 
Quote from traderNik:

No shit!!

The first time you get a bucket-shop type fill, you head for the exits... don't you?

Amazing that Oanda can give you a bucket shop fill and then ask you to jump through hoops to get the trade unwound when you point out that they filled you in a non-existent market.

Even more amazing that people willingly start jumping.

Don't these people understand that they are trading against a for-profit dealing desk? Of course they are going to get hosed trying to scalp or put in 10 pip stops against them.

The only thing an account like Oanda is good for is longer term swings or holds. Trying to daytrade there is just plain stupid.
 
Quote from slapshot:

Don't these people understand that they are trading against a for-profit dealing desk? Of course they are going to get hosed trying to scalp or put in 10 pip stops against them.

The only thing an account like Oanda is good for is longer term swings or holds. Trying to daytrade there is just plain stupid.

lol, all evidence to the contrary, you just gotta know what you're doing is all....

1, 2

Don't people like you understand that just because you can't do something it doesn't mean others can't :D


You keep your head buried deep in the sand of narrow-minded ignorance while the rest of us clean up....

2jbw6wz.jpg
 
Quote from davidmaria1:

Didn't we have these same arguments a year ago?:confused:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G2eUopy9sd8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G2eUopy9sd8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
Quote from slapshot:
Don't these people understand that they are trading against a for-profit dealing desk? Of course they are going to get hosed trying to scalp or put in 10 pip stops against them.
Yep, it's bizarre, all right. You know for sure that when someone claims they're cleaning up trading against a bucket shop (i.e. trading at a bucket shop where the desk is the market), they're most likely working at McDonald's and counting pips in their sleep, or else they're employees of the shop in question.

Not that there's anything wrong with working at McDonald's...

Lately I've been dabbling in the EUR.USD through IDEALPRO, and even there I get what in the markets I normally trade would be considered pretty shabby fills. It's supposed to be an ECN model. Mind you, maybe this is the reality of trading an ECN model, I don't know. I have Button Trader configured to get me optimal fills but sometimes I get 3 pips slippage in fairly calm markets.
 
Back
Top