NYT committed treason claims Trump

[murray t turtle]

Obama did point out Fox several times.

His white house: "We're going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent," she says. "We don't need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave."

Obama also stated that Fox's point of view was ultimately destructive to the United States.

Of course, Fox was one station - IS one station - of conservative viewpoints in a sea of liberalism. What the media has done to Trump has been far, far worse - and his anger is justified. I'm not saying how he went around throwing that anger was correct, but I get his point very clearly.

%% Exactly; and they made a lame attempt to kick FOX news out of the white house press pool.Strangely all the media would have none of that; maybe not because they had a backbone LOL; they knew they could be next for telling the truth . NYT , NBC+ WP...... is known for lies.

Rmemember NBC got caught doing a fake news /fraud news item on GM side mounted gas tanks explosions=NBC got caught shooting a rocket into a GM gas tank/ pickup .,

 

[Tsing Tao]

But the left doesn’t watch as much cable news as the right. Comparing the viewership of fox with the other cable news only shows the left is much more discerning in where they get news from and more likely to NOT get their information from biased sources.

Or the left watches their shows AND Fox shows in the same fashion people who hate Howard Stern listen to him to be angry at him all the time.

I'm curious, do you have viewership data by political affiliation? I don't think I've ever seen that data.

 

[UsualName]

Or the left watches their shows AND Fox shows in the same fashion people who hate Howard Stern listen to him to be angry at him all the time.

I'm curious, do you have viewership data by political affiliation? I don't think I've ever seen that data.

It’s easy to find, Lazy Mary.

 

[Cuddles]

Ah, and I gather you believe the real "doctors" here are the ones at CNN, right? Confirm this so I can show how well some of their "treatment" plans have gone in the past with examples.

It's simple really. Is the bulk of the team made up of journalists who got their degrees from an accredited institution and have been trained in objectivity and will issue retractions when wrong? Are those with "communication degrees" delivering the news compiled by said team?
or
Is it just a bunch of Pundits spouting nonsense?

inb4 "universities are institutions of lefty indoctrination" you shill!!

 

[RedDuke]

Obama did point out Fox several times.

His white house: "We're going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent," she says. "We don't need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave."

Obama also stated that Fox's point of view was ultimately destructive to the United States.

Of course, Fox was one station - IS one station - of conservative viewpoints in a sea of liberalism. What the media has done to Trump has been far, far worse - and his anger is justified. I'm not saying how he went around throwing that anger was correct, but I get his point very clearly.

There is a huge difference between pointing out and disagreeing with a channel or paper vs constantly calling them ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.

 

[LacesOut]

When your organizations are just throwing out lie after lie, attack after attack, and it’s just all #orangemanbad all the time....you appear as an enemy.

LOOK HOW SHOCKED MY FACE IS:

WaPo, NYT writers humiliated yesterday after separate fake news attacks almost immediately shown to be false.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ks_almost_immediately_shown_to_be_false_.html

 

[Tsing Tao]

It’s easy to find, Lazy Mary.

So when you make a statement and someone asks politely "can you please back that up with data?" your response is to, in fact, not show said data that backs up your statement but instead call the other person lazy.

You sure know how to debate, I'll grant you that.

I'm sorry, but I cannot accept your statement unless you back it up with a source.

 

[Tsing Tao]

It's simple really. Is the bulk of the team made up of journalists who got their degrees from an accredited institution and have been trained in objectivity and will issue retractions when wrong? Are those with "communication degrees" delivering the news compiled by said team?
or
Is it just a bunch of Pundits spouting nonsense?

inb4 "universities are institutions of lefty indoctrination" you shill!!

So is Rachael Maddow a pundit or an accredited journalist? What about Don Lemon? Jim Acosta? Al Sharpton?

Please give me your thoughts on these four individuals.

 

[Tsing Tao]

There is a huge difference between pointing out and disagreeing with a channel or paper vs constantly calling them ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.

Only in the semantics you manufacture to ease your partisan mind.

 

[UsualName]

So when you make a statement and someone asks politely "can you please back that up with data?" your response is to, in fact, not show said data that backs up your statement but instead call the other person lazy.

You sure know how to debate, I'll grant you that.

I'm sorry, but I cannot accept your statement unless you back it up with a source.

Not with you, Mary. I know your ways. You play dumb until the point becomes moot.