NYT committed treason claims Trump

[AAAintheBeltway]

The press is allowed and required to attack the President, George Washington was attacked by numerous papers on a daily basis (a few funded by his own Cabinet members), and it has growen ever since.

That's not the issue here. The issue is a sleazy newspaper is purporting to reveal highly confidential national security information. It's hardly the first time this rag has jeopardized our country and the safety of our troops. They need to be held to account. The First Amendment is not an absolute protection and we probably need the Supreme Court to rein in the ridiculous interpretations of it that have grown up over the years.

That said, there was some value to the article. As I recall, part of the article mentioned that the Defense Department or CIA hid from Trump the fact they were undertaking this utterly reckless action. They feared he would block it, as he should. This sort of thing is probably an act of war under international law and should require congressional authorization beforehand. Heads should roll.

 

[Spike Trader]

Guess "enemy of the people" no longer has the same ring to it...

But it also reported that two administration officials believed the president had not been briefed in detail, fearing he might countermand the action against Russia or reveal sensitive information to foreign officials.

They don't tell him anything ,

he is president in name only.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

About 40 tweets ago .... Or yesterday

https://twitter.com/x/status/1140252529428717568

On the plus side, we know he's gonna do time.

 

[El OchoCinco]

That's not the issue here. The issue is a sleazy newspaper is purporting to reveal highly confidential national security information. It's hardly the first time this rag has jeopardized our country and the safety of our troops. They need to be held to account. The First Amendment is not an absolute protection and we probably need the Supreme Court to rein in the ridiculous interpretations of it that have grown up over the years.

That said, there was some value to the article. As I recall, part of the article mentioned that the Defense Department or CIA hid from Trump the fact they were undertaking this utterly reckless action. They feared he would block it, as he should. This sort of thing is probably an act of war under international law and should require congressional authorization beforehand. Heads should roll.

Wait..the newspaper revealed that the U.S. was going to cyber attack Russia? Only problem I see is people with open mouths at the Defense Department but otherwise they are just reporting what they were told. That is what the media does on both sides.

 

[El OchoCinco]

Everybody seems to forget this little gem when FOX News reporter was giving away troop positions in Iraq haha

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/31/sprj.irq.geraldo/

 

[Cuddles]

Half the country would disagree with your highly partisan assertion.

Just because someone calls themselves a doctor, it doesn't make them a doctor. Thankfully that's regulated so half the country don't go to charlatans.

 

[UsualName]

Half the country would disagree with your highly partisan assertion.

Next time you get ice cream at the store check and see if it’s actually ice cream or frozen dairy dessert.

The point is more than half the country thinks they’re eating ice cream too, it doesn’t make it actually ice cream.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Just because someone calls themselves a doctor, it doesn't make them a doctor. Thankfully that's regulated so half the country don't go to charlatans.

Ah, and I gather you believe the real "doctors" here are the ones at CNN, right? Confirm this so I can show how well some of their "treatment" plans have gone in the past with examples.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Next time you get ice cream at the store check and see if it’s actually ice cream or frozen dairy dessert.

The point is more than half the country thinks they’re eating ice cream too, it doesn’t make it actually ice cream.

Except you can distinguish the Ice Cream with a factual analysis of the ingredients. Doing the same analysis on CNN and MSNBC yields a product far below that of frozen dairy dessert.

 

[UsualName]

Except you can distinguish the Ice Cream with a factual analysis of the ingredients. Doing the same analysis on CNN and MSNBC yields a product far below that of frozen dairy dessert.

But the left doesn’t watch as much cable news as the right. Comparing the viewership of fox with the other cable news only shows the left is much more discerning in where they get news from and more likely to NOT get their information from biased sources.