of course she does, cause that's when she heads out to her job on the street corner!
NYSE vs. Nasdq
- Thread starter vox_lucidus
- Start date
of course she does, cause that's when she heads out to her job on the street corner!
well, just being profitable means youve beaten the majority of quants....in addition to that, (ill pardon your short term memory loss) i have a cousin who works for a major quant house, so i have access to what their #s are, and i also beat them, and since they are considered the #1 quant house in the world, and have all sorts of ppl with physics & comp sci & AI phds from ivy league institutions, i feel like they are a good independant point of reference for what should be considered the upper eschelon of quants.....get it now??? i have an idea! you should tell your computer to explain it to you....so you dont have to keep coming
back with invalid assumptions and pathetic attempts at cut downs
back with invalid assumptions and pathetic attempts at cut downs
Quote from axeman:
Watching Vox do the BACK STROKE
What happened to... I can beat the majority of quants?
What happen to...I can wipe ass with computer traders?
Ok...ok... we understand now... you were blowing tons of smoke.
You dont trade for yourself because your not good enough,
and you have to look for a salaried position at an equities
PROP SHOP
I think that about says it all.
peace
axeman
LMAOOOOOOOOO.... cough cough....BULLSHIT.
Which is it vox???
At first you back pedal with:
just being profitable means youve beaten the majority of quants..
AND THEN YOU SAY:
i have a cousin who works for a major quant house, so i have access to what their #s are, and i also beat them, and since they are considered the #1 quant house in the world
So now you BEAT the #1 quant house in the world...BUT
your looking for a salaried position at a PROP FIRM?!?!?!
ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your delusions grow bigger every day.
Next time, let MOMMY count your monopoly money, ok??
peace
axeman
Which is it vox???
At first you back pedal with:
just being profitable means youve beaten the majority of quants..
AND THEN YOU SAY:
i have a cousin who works for a major quant house, so i have access to what their #s are, and i also beat them, and since they are considered the #1 quant house in the world
So now you BEAT the #1 quant house in the world...BUT
your looking for a salaried position at a PROP FIRM?!?!?!
ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your delusions grow bigger every day.
Next time, let MOMMY count your monopoly money, ok??
peace
axeman
alright,
answerto your question:
YES just being profitable DOES beat most quants!
and YES i HAVEbeaten DE Shaw!
weather or not YOU consider them the #1 quant firm or not i don't know and don't care! however many ppl DO consider them to be the #1 quant firm! and again YES i have beaten them CONSISTENTLY! there is one quant that is giving me a run for my money, but im currently beating him! he is peter panholzer of dynex corp in monaco.... so to finish up there was never any 'back pedaling' on my part....but rather i have been utterly consistent
and for the record EVERY PRESTIGIOUS FIRM OFFERS SALARIES TO TRADERS....both quant and discretionary, from DE Shaw to soros fund management....ALL GIVE TRADERS SALARIES, and as these firms house some very very talented traders....i wonder if you would also laugh at them because THEY WERE LOOKING FOR A POSITION AT A FIRM THAT PAID A SALARY!!! but i guess that whole salary thing is just for idiots like me who get jobs at prestegious houses who outperform most other vehicles in existance........
answerto your question:
YES just being profitable DOES beat most quants!
and YES i HAVEbeaten DE Shaw!
weather or not YOU consider them the #1 quant firm or not i don't know and don't care! however many ppl DO consider them to be the #1 quant firm! and again YES i have beaten them CONSISTENTLY! there is one quant that is giving me a run for my money, but im currently beating him! he is peter panholzer of dynex corp in monaco.... so to finish up there was never any 'back pedaling' on my part....but rather i have been utterly consistent
and for the record EVERY PRESTIGIOUS FIRM OFFERS SALARIES TO TRADERS....both quant and discretionary, from DE Shaw to soros fund management....ALL GIVE TRADERS SALARIES, and as these firms house some very very talented traders....i wonder if you would also laugh at them because THEY WERE LOOKING FOR A POSITION AT A FIRM THAT PAID A SALARY!!! but i guess that whole salary thing is just for idiots like me who get jobs at prestegious houses who outperform most other vehicles in existance........
Quote from axeman:
LMAOOOOOOOOO.... cough cough....BULLSHIT.
Which is it vox???
At first you back pedal with:
just being profitable means youve beaten the majority of quants..
AND THEN YOU SAY:
i have a cousin who works for a major quant house, so i have access to what their #s are, and i also beat them, and since they are considered the #1 quant house in the world
So now you BEAT the #1 quant house in the world...BUT
your looking for a salaried position at a PROP FIRM?!?!?!
ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your delusions grow bigger every day.
Next time, let MOMMY count your monopoly money, ok??
peace
axeman
Quote from axeman:
NEWSFLASH!!!!!
Vox has beaten the #1 Quant Fund in the WORLD!!!!!
BWAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
(But he is looking for prop firm SALARY! LMAOOOOOOOOO)
peace
axeman
Jesus H Christ...... I would have thought that Vox's meds would have kicked in by now.....
If you have a job at a prestigious house, why are you looking to go to a prop firm. And if you want to get a salary at one of these "prestigious firms," why are you looking at daytrading prop firms (which virtually never offer any salary). By the way, since you are at a prestigious firm, which one is it (I'm sure it is so big that it would reveal nothing about who you are).