You keep dodging the central issue.
WHY IN THE HELL WOULD YOU EVEN BE LOOKING FOR A SALARIED
POSITION IF YOU CAN TRADE SO WELL THAT YOU CAN BEAT
THE MAJORITY OF QUANTS AND ALL OF OUR COMPUTER SYSTEMS??
If you had better stats than MY systems, and a decent amount
of capital, you certainly would never look for a salaried position again.
You simply dont make ANY sense. Period.
I guess what you are trying to say is:
You cant trade well enough to live on your profits so you need a salary
peace
axeman
WHY IN THE HELL WOULD YOU EVEN BE LOOKING FOR A SALARIED
POSITION IF YOU CAN TRADE SO WELL THAT YOU CAN BEAT
THE MAJORITY OF QUANTS AND ALL OF OUR COMPUTER SYSTEMS??
If you had better stats than MY systems, and a decent amount
of capital, you certainly would never look for a salaried position again.
You simply dont make ANY sense. Period.
I guess what you are trying to say is:
You cant trade well enough to live on your profits so you need a salary

peace
axeman
Quote from vox_lucidus:
beating most system quants is no big feat! if your even proffitable yourbeating most quants LOL, and furthermore ive NEVER EVEN HEARD of a position with a fund that dosent have a salary, im sure theres one in existance, but its far more the exceptionthan the rule....if u knew shit about the industry i wouldnt have to tell you that, and you wouldnt be making a fool of yourself like this...