I'm mixed on this issue for a couple of reasons.
I think that funds are going to have a more difficult time getting into bigger size since they won't have a human there to manage iceberg orders. At the same time, having a computer do it in a systematic fashion, might just create an opportunity for discretionary tape readers to exploit.
My sense tells me that firms like Pipeline will continue to expand and that hidden books of block orders will take greater hold.
There needs to be recognition of that fact that funds will run reverse desks more often in order to load up on stocks that they want to own. The logical consequence of THAT is more frequent fading of moves and, yes, lower volatility.
I think that funds are going to have a more difficult time getting into bigger size since they won't have a human there to manage iceberg orders. At the same time, having a computer do it in a systematic fashion, might just create an opportunity for discretionary tape readers to exploit.
My sense tells me that firms like Pipeline will continue to expand and that hidden books of block orders will take greater hold.
There needs to be recognition of that fact that funds will run reverse desks more often in order to load up on stocks that they want to own. The logical consequence of THAT is more frequent fading of moves and, yes, lower volatility.