NYSE says Electronic Trading Black Box for plunge

Quote from risktaker:

I trade all the major European exchanges and none of this US bullshit happens there!

Not in Paris.
Not in London.
Not on Xetra.
Not in Madrid.
Not in Milan.
Not on Chi-X.
Not on OMX.
Not in Oslo.

Yes, they're all electronic. They just don't have these leeches like in the US fucking up the market every day!

They also don't have the liquidity or volume we do. Fuck, all of them put together don't....
 
Quote from Angrycat:

Totally agree. But if your goddamn black box is too stupid to know when to stop fucking selling, then you should eat the loss. Why should their trades be busted? Why are good traders (and good black box makers, for that matter - the good ones know when to stop) have to subsidize the idiots?

That's the part that pisses me off. Sure...this was an uncomfortable day (although, admit it - we all missed the excitement during the lull of the last year), but the market will adjust. Subsidizing morons pisses me off.


Subsidizing morons is the American way lately..
 
Risktaker: where were you just a few years back when a Deutsche Bank grad trainee flushed the DAX on Eurex for huge and then managed to bust the trade and bankrupt all the locals who took the other side? Eurex is in Franfurt if I'm not mistaken, and Deutsche Bank is a German Bank.

And why can every European trader have access to the cash U.S. sovereign debt markets, but American traders can't have access to EuroMTS? Because the European Banks don't want me in there. Don't believe me? Ask a Citadel or Getco trader - they will confirm.

Don't even go there, lots more where that came from.
 
Quote from Trendytrader:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aktCEVdfmfys&pos=1

Electronic Trading to Blame for Plunge, NYSE’s Leibowitz Says
Share Business ExchangeTwitterFacebook| Email | Print | A A A

By Chris Nagi and Matt Miller

May 6 (Bloomberg) -- Computerized trades sent to electronic networks turned an orderly stock market decline into a rout today, according to Larry Leibowitz, the chief operating officer of NYSE Euronext.

While the first half of the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s 998.5-point plunge probably reflected normal trading, the selloff snowballed because of orders sent to venues with no investors willing to match them, Leibowitz said in an interview on Bloomberg Television.

“If you look at the charts you can see fairly clearly where the trades came in,” he said from New York. “It’s that V-shaped drop where it came down and snapped right back up. You had some very high-cap stocks trading down 50 percent or large percentages in a split instant because there really was no liquidity in electronic markets.”

The selloff briefly erased more than $1 trillion in market value as the Dow average tumbled 9.2 percent, its biggest intraday percentage loss since 1987, before paring the drop.

I'm finding Larry's remarks hard to believe. I don't know what Euronext is.

No investors willing to match? Probably true. Specialists' duty to offset them. For a transaction/fill to occur, there has to be another party. Period.

But hey, let's blame it on the black box boogy man. It's convenient. And, we can reinforce it with riots in Greece and oil spills. "They'll" buy it.
 
IMO, this thing was for real. Real money, real players, real trades. Just look in one minute charts of the ES how it is smoothly draging down b4 14:45. Just a plain simple falling knife. PG fell off the table at 14:46, relative value traders (pairs) or panic selling but the people traders are responsible for the orders they send, market orders get the market price!
I'd be pissed having my trades busted on the NAZ.
And if someone can prove to me that there was a fat finger or misquote or wathever program that made the market fall for unreal reasons please tell us. With strong arguments or proofs I will be all ears.
 
Quote from efficiency:

I'm finding Larry's remarks hard to believe. I don't know what Euronext is.
Remarks, this is what it is. A poem nothing less. "It's that V-shaped drop where it came down and snaped back right back up". Sir, why dont you look at the drop in 2008: It was a V-shaped drop where it came down and snaped back right back up. Was is for real then?
Chearleader.
 
If they are breaking he trades then it means BY DEFINITION it was NOT normal trading - otherwise no reason for breaking of trade - so someone made a mistake and someone is culpable.

Looks like one of the major customers of the casino stood to lose so they changed the rules of the game mid way through as usual - Ace was high, but is now low coz someone other than the protected ones was holding aces.

Of course we can all relax knowing that justice will be done now that the fearless 'leave no stone unturned' SEC is on the case..................................

That said, they probably have to break the trades to keep 'da liddle guy' turning up and paying rent to the oligarchy.
 
Quote from krazykarl:

They also don't have the liquidity or volume we do. Fuck, all of them put together don't....


Yes, but at least it's real volume. Like it used to be in US years ago. None of this penny phuking bs that goes on nowadays.
 
Quote from Angrycat:

Totally agree. But if your goddamn black box is too stupid to know when to stop fucking selling, then you should eat the loss. Why should their trades be busted? Why are good traders (and good black box makers, for that matter - the good ones know when to stop) have to subsidize the idiots?

That's the part that pisses me off. Sure...this was an uncomfortable day (although, admit it - we all missed the excitement during the lull of the last year), but the market will adjust. Subsidizing morons pisses me off.

+1 I agree.

It's none of anyone's fucking business how someone trades (or decide not to trade). But the exchange should not reverse those trades considering they themselves denied any error with the exchange itself.

To the exchange there should be no difference between average joe pressing the buy button on his screen at home vs a multi-billion firm using high frequency box submitting trades.

The exchange needs to be fair and impartial, by reversing those trades they are basically saying even though there is nothing wrong with the execution, but since the big players lost a lot of money from their crappy trading strategy, we will give it back. That makes those exchanges lose all credibility
 
Back
Top