NY Times opposes Obama on targeted killings

Quote from VVV1234:

Pheonix Trader, please don't pollute my threads with your
asinine commentary.

VVV... You will find that having an intelligent conversation with these guys to be impossible. They lack the intelligent part of it. And their maturity and rationality level is very low also. One can choose to ignore them or wallow with them in the mud but don't expect intelligent discussion. They would rather sling shit than think.
 
Quote from VVV1234:

What are the forum rules as you understand them? One must insult other posters, question their integrity and issue idiotic commentary? If so, I am happy to break your rules.

You are unable to speak your mind using your regular ET account so you've created an alias account so that you can post anonymously. That is what cowards like you and Ricter do because you lack the balls it takes to have your words attributed to you.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

+1

It's funny that a statement as true as this is gets a response from 377 "What a load of shit". Of course the truth of it resonates deep down in the small part of his brain that still works, which cause cognitive dissonance with the deluded righty part, so he lashes out with a grunt.

Only a halfwit would be gullible enough to buy into the lies Ricter spews all over this forum but we already know that about you from your alarmist AGW proselytizing.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

VVV... You will find that having an intelligent conversation with these guys to be impossible. They lack the intelligent part of it. And their maturity and rationality level is very low also. One can choose to ignore them or wallow with them in the mud but don't expect intelligent discussion. They would rather sling shit than think.

Right, and not a peep out of you expressing concerns over NEO's, especially since a tiny one made world news last week.

I find it rather hard to fathom your sincerity about your previously stated smarmy highfalutin concerns for the earth.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

+1

It's funny that a statement as true as this is gets a response from 377 "What a load of shit". Of course the truth of it resonates deep down in the small part of his brain that still works, which cause cognitive dissonance with the deluded righty part, so he lashes out with a grunt.
He's just knee-jerking to the second part of my statement, about inequality. As if the wealthy don't take steps to protect what they have when it looks like the "undeserving" are massing up to take some.
 
Quote from Ricter:

. That's not good, not at all, but it does jive with rising inequality and falling social cohesion,
Maybe I'm not understanding your usage but "rising inequality" is nothing to fear.
What would be really screwed up in a society is everyone being the same.
Markets and trade are based upon differing personal utilities and priorities of value.

IOW: exactly equal people don't trade or do business with each other.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

+1

It's funny that a statement as true as this is gets a response from 377 "What a load of shit". Of course the truth of it resonates deep down in the small part of his brain that still works, which cause cognitive dissonance with the deluded righty part, so he lashes out with a grunt.
On further thought, I don't like my answer. How do I reconcile the (supposedly) more secretive Obama administration, which is, according to the right, "socialist", with my belief that the plutocracy is circling the wagons?
 
Back
Top