Quote from Thunderdog:
Then why did you not say that to the guy who wrote this post, which I was responding to:
Since his politically charged post preceded mine but you chose to insult me for merely responding to it, does that make you a blatant hypocrite who's full of shit? I would say yes. Yes, it does.
Oh, so it's not "political" if you happen to agree. (And, of course, the current situation in NYC has nothing to do with the previous administration's aversion to financial regulation. Yeah, that's the ticket.)Quote from Clubber Lang:
Ummm, his post was factual information. NYC voted overwhelmingly for Obama and his "change". Now they are reaping the rewards of voting in a socialist.
Now get back into your P&R hole.
Quote from Thunderdog:
Oh, so it's not "political" if you happen to agree. (And, of course, the current situation in NYC has nothing to do with the previous administration's aversion to financial regulation. Yeah, that's the ticket.)
And you can get back into your own asshole. [/QUOTE
Barney Frank "I just don't see a problem" as he collects all his kick backs from this quasi government enterprise. Don't think for a second the republicans aren't to blame as well. Democrats are just as guilty as republicans, they are all the same in my book.
I agree with 1 and 2. However, the jury is out on your opinion and, in any event, has not yet had the time to even begin to play itself out. Perhaps Obama's policies will cause a whole new set of problems of a greater order of magnitude and perhaps not. However, the current situation is entirely on the previous administration, because Bush's legacy did not end on the day he left office. The shit began to hit the fan while he was still in place and can be traced back to the Republicans' aversion to adequate regulation. The lid is now off the 8-year compost.Quote from ByLoSellHi:
Let's not take this too far into politics, but let's agree on the following:
1) Obama won an overwhelming majority of the New York City vote (probably 80% plus easily);
and
2) The things in place that are leading to economic failings were in place in the last administration, and are getting no better under Obama.
*My opinion is that Obama's economic policy is horrid, and that he has not only continued, but massively expanded the terrible policies put into place by Paulson & Bernanke under Bush, now with Geithner and Bernanke.
Quote from Mnphats:
Maybe so, but Obama's call a few years ago for increased regulation in the financial sector essentially fell on deaf ears. You also fail to acknowledge that it was the credit default swaps that turbo-charged the problem -- those unregulated derivatives without which the senseless lending and securitized mortgages would not have reached nearly the audacious scale they had reached.Quote from Thunderdog:
Oh, so it's not "political" if you happen to agree. (And, of course, the current situation in NYC has nothing to do with the previous administration's aversion to financial regulation. Yeah, that's the ticket.)
And you can get back into your own asshole. [/QUOTE
Barney Frank "I just don't see a problem" as he collects all his kick backs from this quasi government enterprise. Don't think for a second the republicans aren't to blame as well. Democrats are just as guilty as republicans, they are all the same in my book.
Quote from Clubber Lang:
Ummm, his post was factual information. NYC voted overwhelmingly for Obama and his "change". Now they are reaping the rewards of voting in a socialist.