Your supposition is that religious thinkers were the first philosophers.
I doubt this to be true.
Branches of Vedic thought is actually atheistic in nature, (similarly seen in Buddhists atheistic beliefs) suggesting that God has nothing to do with human behaviors right or wrong, but rather the condition of life speaks of cause and effect, the Eternal Law of Karma. Karma states what you do to others will come back upon you in time, either this lifetime for future lifetimes.
That really is the essence of the Golden Rule, that as you do unto others, so will the same be done unto you, so as people naturally don't want bad things done to them, it is wrong to do them to others. This theory is not morally derived necessarily the way most people think, coming from some Higher Power demanding certain behaviors, but right is determined as much as it serves the individual self interest maximally in terms for future pain. Morality can have nothing at all to do with God, as my argument shows. It has simply to do with what mankind thinks is right for himself...to be subjected to pain as a a result of his actions...not by God or because God said so, but by the nature of the Universal Law of cause and effect. Right then become selfish from the point of view of doing what is right for the individual and their actions, and the benefit socially as it produces actions that are not harmful to others.
This ideas predates any religion you are probably thinking of, and is hard wired into our human experience and common sense and logic does the rest.
That these ideas derived from atheistic thought, coincide with a Christian Golden Rule is not by coincidence in practice, nor also that they dovetail with Kant's moral imperative derived from pure reason, as all are grounded in the universal human experience of logic, reason, and common sense.
Human mind predates religion, unless of course you are suggesting religion did not actually come from God, but from man's imagination...but even that situation requires the mind to come before the imagination.
I still contend that thoughts by humans of what is right predates formalized religion, and doing unto others as you would have them do unto you is not the product of any particular religion, but as a consequence and product of the mind of man that was designed by God.
I doubt this to be true.
Branches of Vedic thought is actually atheistic in nature, (similarly seen in Buddhists atheistic beliefs) suggesting that God has nothing to do with human behaviors right or wrong, but rather the condition of life speaks of cause and effect, the Eternal Law of Karma. Karma states what you do to others will come back upon you in time, either this lifetime for future lifetimes.
That really is the essence of the Golden Rule, that as you do unto others, so will the same be done unto you, so as people naturally don't want bad things done to them, it is wrong to do them to others. This theory is not morally derived necessarily the way most people think, coming from some Higher Power demanding certain behaviors, but right is determined as much as it serves the individual self interest maximally in terms for future pain. Morality can have nothing at all to do with God, as my argument shows. It has simply to do with what mankind thinks is right for himself...to be subjected to pain as a a result of his actions...not by God or because God said so, but by the nature of the Universal Law of cause and effect. Right then become selfish from the point of view of doing what is right for the individual and their actions, and the benefit socially as it produces actions that are not harmful to others.
This ideas predates any religion you are probably thinking of, and is hard wired into our human experience and common sense and logic does the rest.
That these ideas derived from atheistic thought, coincide with a Christian Golden Rule is not by coincidence in practice, nor also that they dovetail with Kant's moral imperative derived from pure reason, as all are grounded in the universal human experience of logic, reason, and common sense.
Human mind predates religion, unless of course you are suggesting religion did not actually come from God, but from man's imagination...but even that situation requires the mind to come before the imagination.
I still contend that thoughts by humans of what is right predates formalized religion, and doing unto others as you would have them do unto you is not the product of any particular religion, but as a consequence and product of the mind of man that was designed by God.
Quote from drmarkan:
I agree that people will reject pain and not want to be killed. The question is whether they can decide that it is morally wrong for themselves. Fight or flight is definitely hard-wired into the mind of everyone as an instinct because they do not want to feel pain. This is different than deciding that it is ethically and/or morally wrong to do these things.