***NSFW*** Sex workers slam crypto-based ‘Uber for escorts’ over safety fears

johnarb said:
I'm sorry I came across as such. I'll be more careful to not appear that way.

Can you please tell me what you see on the blockchain that is so important to the companies you mentioned? Just one single item that is not available on an Oracle database system.

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/bloc...0b95b4a040580a187ff999ba6f55e637fc6ad5aa94537
More...
You have way too much time on your hands. Why not contact the companies I mentioned if you really want to know. Start with investor relations, and annual reports, all the firms have been quite public with their adaption of blockchain.

Of course maybe they did it just to "fool people" as you suggested.
 
Last edited:
sss12 said:
You have way too much time on your hands. Why not contact the companies I mentioned if you really want to know. Start with investor relations, and annual reports, all the firms have been quite public with their adaption of blockchain.

Of course maybe they did it just to "fool people".
More...

I didn't invest in those companies so it's not my concern what they do. However, I'm asking for one single item from you as you mentioned you invested in the blockchain and surely you know what you're investing in.
 
johnarb said:
I didn't invest in those companies so it's not my concern what they do. However, I'm asking for one single item from you as you mentioned you invested in the blockchain and surely you know what you're investing in.
More...
Get off the boards and social media and do some real due dilligence if you really want to know who is using what technologies, etc. Your other tread where you keep re posting stale news is typical of those not truely involved. Everyone on Wall Street knew the ETF was dead in the water (again) this time around. The CFA involvement was on the risks of crypto, not the adoption.

You can argue and debate all you want, but the marketplace dictates, wheather it is the fortune 50 using blockchain (per them) or the price of BTC tanking. If you're not out there finding out why (and it's not on social media, etc) you'll always be behind the curve.
 
Last edited:
I do want to say, why would anyone use bitcoin for blockchain when you can't even store that much information on it? Take factom for example, you could store proof of information in their chain but not the information it self. Bitcoin does not need to have a higher price in order to succeed, blockchain is not bitcoin.

For the oracle reference, I think the idea is behind the transparency of "not" printing money and being able to store information that is verifiable non-modifiable on the blockchain.

On the second part (storing information as proof) is a quite complex matter as you can have plenty of ways around it, it requires a whole logistic around it which in my opinion is not feasible.

With all due regards,
Dante
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top