NRA lashes out at boycott movement as United, Delta and other corporations cut ties

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...o-global-corporations/?utm_term=.3cee7168f60a


NRA lashes out at boycott movement as United, Delta and other corporations cut ties

by Avi Selk February 24 at 6:06 PM

The National Rifle Association lashed out at corporations rushing to abandon it, as companies from United Airlines to Best Western have cut ties with the gun lobby group under pressure from a boycott movement following a Feb. 14 high school shooting.

Without context, twin announcements from Delta and United airlines on Saturday morning might look trivial: The end of flight discounts to the NRA’s annual convention, which few outside the gun rights organization likely knew existed before they became boycott targets.

Delta is reaching out to the NRA to let them know we will be ending their contract for discounted rates through our group travel program. We will be requesting that the NRA remove our information from their website.

— Delta (@Delta) February 24, 2018
United is notifying the NRA that we will no longer offer a discounted rate to their annual meeting and we are asking that the NRA remove our information from their website.

— United Airlines (@united) February 24, 2018
But in abandoning the NRA, the airlines followed car rental giants Avis, Hertz and Enterprise, the Best Western hotel chain, the global insurance company MetLife, and more than a dozen other corporations that have severed affiliations with the gun group in the last two days.

Morning Mix newsletter

Stories that will be the talk of the morning.



In a statement released Saturday afternoon, the NRA accused companies of “a shameful display of political and civic cowardice.”

“Let it be absolutely clear,” the NRA’s statement said. “The loss of a discount will neither scare nor distract one single NRA member from our mission to stand and defend the individual freedoms that have always made America the greatest nation in the world.”

While it’s unclear what effect the corporate snubs will have on the NRA, they have given the nascent #BoycottNRA a string of rapid, prominent victories and exposed vulnerabilities in a gun rights lobby that had seemed untouchable before 17 people — most of them students — were gunned down last week at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla.

The NRA claims 5 million members and takes in tens of millions of dollars each year through supporters, which it uses to fight gun regulations in the name of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees Americans the right to bear arms.

[ Obstacles — and silence — on Capitol Hill even as clamor for new gun laws grows ]

The group has faced public anger before — after the massacre of schoolchildren at Sandy Hook Elementary in 2012, for example. But it has always fought back against pushes for new gun laws, and efforts to significantly restrict firearms inevitably die out as public fury over the shootings ebbs.

But outrage over the Parkland shooting — sustained in part by politically active teenagers who survived the massacre — has shown no signs of fading. Police say a former student killed 17 people with a legally purchased semiautomatic rifle, one of at least 10 guns he owned.

As calls for gun control have spread, the NRA has increasingly become a target of activists, with social media hashtags urging boycotts of any corporation found to be linked with it.

Delta and United are the latest to submit to the pressure.

15 brands have now ended their relationship with the @NRA:

1. @MetLife
2. @symantec
3. @BestWestern
4. @Wyndham
5. @Alamo
6. @NationalPro
7. @Enterprise
8. @FNBOmaha
9. @Hertz
10. @Budget
11. @Avis
12. @NortonOnline
13. @northAmericanVL
14. @SimpliSafe
15. @ChubbNA#BoycottNRA

— Ryan Knight #BoycottNRA (@ProudResister) February 23, 2018
First National Bank of Omaha, one of the largest private U.S. banks, may have been the first to respond publicly to the boycott calls. The bank had previously advertised the “Official Credit Card of the NRA,” according to the Omaha World-Herald — a Visa card with 5 percent back on gas and sporting good purchases.

“Customer feedback has caused us to review our relationship with the NRA,” the bank said in a statement published Thursday, eights days after the Parkland shooting. “As a result, First National Bank of Omaha will not renew its contract with the National Rifle Association to issue the NRA Visa Card.”

Enterprise followed suit a few hours later. “All three of our brands have ended the discount for NRA members,” effective March 26, the car rental company wrote on Twitter Thursday afternoon. Hertz, Avis Budget Group and TrueCar would soon join Enterprise and end their NRA discounts. So did movers North American Van Lines and Allied Van Lines.

On Friday morning, Symantec announced that the boycott movement had spread to the software industry. NRA members will now have to pay the same price for its anti-virus software as everyone else.

Symantec has stopped its discount program with the National Rifle Association.

— Symantec (@symantec) February 23, 2018
On the same day, insurer Chubb Limited announced that it will stop underwriting “NRA Carry Guard,” a policy marketed to NRA members who face legal or civil lawsuits after they shoot someone, which gun opponents sometimes call “murder insurance.” A spokesman for Chubb told Reuters that the company had made the decision months ago, but its announcement of the fact on Friday only increased the perception of a boycott movement swelling against the NRA.

It has now spread across numerous industries and affected some of the world’s largest corporations. The global insurance company MetLife said it has terminated discounts for NRA members. Best Western and Wyndham Hotels announced they are no longer affiliated with the NRA.

Facing questions from the liberal outlet ThinkProgress about its discounts for NRA members flying to the group’s convention in May, a Delta spokesman at first defended the program as “routine.” The airline “has more than 2,000 such contracts in place,” the spokesman said, ThinkProgress wrote Friday evening.

Come daybreak, Delta abruptly discontinued the discounts and asked the NRA to take the airline’s name off its website. United Airlines followed suit the same morning.

Like other companies that ditched the NRA, the airlines faced an immediate backlash from gun rights supporters.

Why do companies insist on playing politics and risk losing a lot of business? The NRA didn't cause this. Law enforcement failures are mostly responsible #badbusiness $UAL #unitedairlines

— 991turbo (@wide_tires) February 24, 2018
Some other companies have, so far, not been moved by the boycott calls. FedEx, for example, still gives NRA Business Alliance members up to a 26 percent discount on shipping expenses. Google, Amazon, Apple and Roku all stream an NRA-produced video channel despite pressure from gun-control groups.

[ ‘The Snake’: How Trump appropriated a radical black singer’s lyrics for immigration fearmongering ]

This follows a week when NRA leaders spoke defiantly at public appearances, blaming the fury on media manipulation.

“Many in legacy media love mass shootings,” Loesch said Thursday at a conservative political conference. “Crying white mothers are ratings gold.”

“They want to make us all less free,” NRA chief executive Wayne LaPierre said when he took the microphone. The correct response to the Florida shooting, he said, was more armed security on school campuses — not fewer guns in the United States.

Pressure campaigns have become a favorite tool of liberal groups during Trump’s presidency — from early efforts to boycott Trump-branded products to a Twitter campaign that identified and exposed people seen marching at a far-right protest in Charlottesville this past summer. Social media and Internet companies began to ban far-right personalities from their sites after that rally turned violent.

So far, for all the companies that have signed on, the NRA boycotts have managed only to wipe out a few peripheral perks for the group’s members. But if the movement keeps spreading, there are signs it could threaten the financial and political cornerstones of the gun lobby. Still, the long-term effects are unknown.

After the Parkland shooting, a prominent City Council member in Dallas said the city no longer wants the NRA to hold its convention there in May, Fox News reported. But officials in Kansas and Nebraska have invited the gun group’s business.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott and other Republicans have endorsed banning rifle sales to anyone under age 21 — which the NRA opposes. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), on the other hand, at a recent CNN town hall this week said he would continue to accept political contributions from the gun rights group.)

According to Business Insider, the NRA is funded largely by the gun industry, which has contributed tens of millions of dollars and helped the gun lobby build alliances and power networks across the U.S. political system.

[ A Trump voter’s message to retailers: ‘Keep your mouths shut about our president’ ]

The same industry, of course, also makes many off the hundreds of millions of guns believed to be in the country. So the most ambitious gun-control advocates would love to cut off that financial backing.

The Parkland shooting and its negative publicity caused the investment giant BlackRock to explore ways of letting its clients disinvest from gun companies, Bloomberg News reported. Teachers in Florida are pressuring their pension fund managers to do the same. But gun industry stocks are widely held. CNBC reported this week that some of Wall Street’s largest exchange-traded funds include holdings in several gunmakers.

And investors may be hesitant to dump gunmakers’ stocks as long as the companies remain lucrative.

New York Times financial columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin, five days after the Parkland shooting, made a proposal: Banks and credit companies could effectively ban assault weapons right now, simply by prohibiting customers from using their services to buy them.

Financial companies ban the purchase of products like cryptocurrency with credit cards, Sorkin wrote, and some executives were considering policies that would lead “assault weapons [to] be eliminated from virtually every firearms store in America because otherwise the sellers would be cut off from the credit card systems.”

Gunmakers also use credit to make purchases, so banks could throttle them from the supply side, as well. Whether banks would do this, however, is in question. In 2012, Snopes investigated a report that Bank of America was cutting off credit lines to gun manufacturers. A spokeswoman for the bank denied the report, saying it had no policies against doing business with the firearms industry and pointing to a $250 million deal with a gunmaker that same month.

Six years later, amid the growing outrage from the Stoneman Douglas massacre, the bank sounds very different.

Axios reported on Saturday that Bank of America was “reexamining” its relationship with AR-15 rifle manufacturers who do business with it.

“We are joining other companies in our industry to examine what we can do to help end the tragedy of mass shootings,” Bank of America said in a statement.
 
Symantec/Norton one in the same.
Enterprise/Alamo one in the same.
Budget/Hertz ditto. Those off the top of my head without looking up parent Co.s

The list isn't what you think.
 
I've already got a list...

Y'know.. Kellogs, Starbucks, Amazon and quite a few other. The companies involved here will be added and I won't patronize them for, well, life.

If a company is so stupid as to exhibit liberal politics as a corporate policy then they deserve boycott.
 
Symantec/Norton one in the same.
Enterprise/Alamo one in the same.
Budget/Hertz ditto. Those off the top of my head without looking up parent Co.s

The list isn't what you think.

Its not the same for people who like one or the other.Many rental car companies are very different even though they have the same parent company.
 
Its not the same for people who like one or the other.Many rental car companies are very different even though they have the same parent company.

Yes but the parent controls the subsidiaries. So the list shows all the different companies to make it look like there's a big combined effort when in reality it's a few conglomerates making decision for the group.

If someone wanted to take the time to look up the founders and key people I'd bet their all Liberal donors.
 
Last edited:
Here are 6 creepy similarities between the NRA and the Church of Scientology
David Edwards
25 May 2016 at 14:39 ET

scientology_lapierre2-800x430.jpg

Church of Scientology leader David Miscavige and NRA leader Wayne LaPierre (YouTube/screen grabs)


While the Church of Scientology and the National Rifle Association may not have a lot of overlap in membership, the two secretive organizations have a lot in common.

1. Secrecy in the face of controversy

Whether it’s the massacre of school children at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown or the controversial shooting of Trayvon Martin, the NRA has a time-tested strategy of going silent in the face of scandal.

After the Newtown shooting, the NRA deactivated its Facebook page and refused to comment for days.

“You see, the NRA and its political minions like to work in the shadows,” the Brady Campaign’s Daniel Gross wrote in 2012 after George Zimmerman killed Trayvon Martin. “They cannot credibly explain to voters why they support loopholes that allow criminals to buy guns without background checks, or allow terrorists to buy all the AK-47s they desire. Secrecy and cynicism are their greatest allies.”

Scientology has been known to employ a similar media strategy when books and movies expose the church: It refuses to comment on scandals, and then works in secret to discredit enemies.

“Scientology has become one of the most impenetrable and least understood new religious movements,” Hugh B. Urban wrote in the Journal of the American Academy of Religion in 2006. “And the more scrutiny the movement has faced from the government, anticult groups, and the media, the more intense its strategies of selfconcealment have become.”

2. Insulated leaders who demand blind devotion

Both Church of Scientology leader David Miscavige and NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre are notoriously secretive leaders who show up at events to deliver speeches from an insulated bubble and then disappear from media scrutiny without having to face questions from their followers.

Of statements by LaPierre that have been fact checked by Politifact, over 80 percent have been found to be half true, mostly false and false. But in recent years, most of his appearances are scripted speeches at NRA conventions and other conservative gatherings. And although he does occasionally grant a Sunday morning interview, he more often than not avoids the press for months at a time.

Miscavige is even more of a recluse. With the exception of a 1992 Nightline interview with Ted Koppel, Miscavige rarely emerges from his bubble to face scrutiny of any kind. Even the church’s top celebrity member, Tom Cruise, is said to worship Miscavige “like a god.”

3. Scorched earth tactics against opponents

Through funding pro-gun candidates, lobbying efforts and propaganda, the NRA has nearly mastered the ability to tilt the balance of power in Congress in its favor. It spends nearly 28 times the amount of money as all pro-gun safety groups to defeat candidates and even the most reasonable gun control measures, including the CDC’s effort to use science to understand violent crime.

“That was the one group where I said, ‘As long as I’m in office, I’m not bucking the N.R.A.’” one congressman told The New York Times in 2013.

Likewise, Scientology’s shady tactics against its opponents are well documented in HBO’s Going Clear. Under its “fair game” policy, so-called suppressive persons (SP) “may be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.”

4. Crushing members over small deviations from doctrine

NRA members who stray from absolute agreement can expect the organization to push back hard. When Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) tried to support universal background checks after the Newtown massacre, the NRA quickly organized against the longtime member to defeat the measure.

The New York Times reported:

On the afternoon of Monday, April 15, Manchin was surprised to learn about an email that the N.R.A. had sent to his Senate colleagues. The email (a similar version of which went out to N.R.A. members) ended any pretense of neutrality by announcing that the organization would vehemently oppose the Manchin-Toomey bill. In addition, the organization said it would “score” the vote — meaning, it would factor into its election-year grading system how each senator voted on the bill. (In some conservative states, an N.R.A. grade can be determinative; as one former legislator told me, “When you come from a state like mine, you’d better be with them 100 percent.”)

Aghast, Manchin got Jim Baker on the phone. “Jim, why’d you change?” he recalls asking.

Rather than answer the question, Baker simply replied: “We’re totally opposed to it. We’re going to be fighting it with all we have.”

Scientology also saves its harshest attacks for members who turn on the church. After actress Leah Remini left the church, former member Jason Beghe told journalist Tony Ortega how the organization made life a living hell on defectors.

“These guys are crazy. And all of this shit is straight out of the L. Ron Hubbard playbook. That’s their scriptures,” he explained. “They say they’re not a turn-the-other-cheek religion. No. they’re a knock-you-down-and-kick-you-in-the-balls religion.”

5. Abandoning core mission in favor of profit

The missions of both the NRA and the Church of Scientology have strayed wildly from their initial charters.

The NRA was founded in 1871 as one of “America’s foremost pro-gun control organizations,” Alternet pointed out in 2013. “It was not until 1977 when the NRA that Americans know today emerged, after libertarians who equated owning a gun with the epitome of freedom and fomented widespread distrust against government—if not armed insurrection—emerged after staging a hostile leadership coup.”

And today, less than half of the NRA’s revenue comes from members and programs. Between 2005 and 2013, the gun industry provided as much as $50 million in funds to the pro-gun organization. In fact, many companies in the gun industry donate a portion of their sales directly to the NRA.

Likewise, Scientology today is less about religious evangelism and more about using the church’s tax exempt status to amass more than $3 billion in assets while having fewer than 50,000 members.

6. Lack of financial transparency

And good luck finding out where all that money is going.

According to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), the NRA has had nearly $60 million in undisclosed spending since 2008.

“It seems like every month we find more political activity that the NRA illegally failed to disclose,” CREW Executive Director Noah Bookbinder noted earlier this year. “The NRA’s consistent and egregious flouting of laws and requirements in its tax filings has become a disturbing pattern and needs to be investigated.”

As for Scientology, the IRS awarded the church tax exempt status in 1993 after a long fought battle. And because Scientology is recognized as a church, courts have ruled that it does not have to disclose its finances by filing IRS Form 990 like other tax-exempt organizations.
 
Back
Top