Curious. On E-Signal it is 8:39:46 (CT) not :16, but yes, that is the one.Originally posted by ArchAngel
I'm looking at the NQ data (on Quote.com though) and it shows a 1419.50 trade at 9:39:16am ET which is probably what you're seeing.
yup, same server.Originally posted by ArchAngel
If Metastock isn't showing it, it's probably a problem with it rather than the datafeed. Were you connected to the same physical server when you looked at it in MS vs. the normal eSignal program? if not, it could be a server-specific discrepancy. If so, then it's probably an MS bug.
"Live" in MS it didn't show.
The data I used to check MS includes refreshed and cached -- neither showed the 1419.5 tick in the tick chart (both did in 1mn).Originally posted by stevet
there are also some issues in esignal data in metastock - one of which is that they use different timing - i can't remember which is which now - but one ends the interval on the stated time, and one starts the interval at the stated time - there is also the fact that metastock compares new data to any old data stored, in order to update any changes - and this can cause some anomalies, and certainly throw metastock into a loop
if i recall correctly, they also build there interval periods from different time frames
That is what is odd to me -- refreshed, "corrected," realtime -- none showed 1419.5 in MS tick.Originally posted by rtstrading
... Of course the refreshed data is the corrected data, but that does not help the matter when trying to compare realtime signals with the after-the-fact signals with the corrected data. I have compared my realtime signals vs. the corrected data and the results seem to all wash out about the same over a given period of time.
Maybe that is the key: MS employs 1mn data for everything > 1mn while the tick data is somehow sourced or interpreted differently.Originally posted by rtstrading
I am using one minute data. This one minute data that is maintained in the Metastock realtime data cache is used to determine 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minute bars for charting purposes.
-- thanks all for the help