NPR advocates censorship with this act

Quote from Gabfly1:

An incorrect and, perhaps not so surprisingly, self-serving conclusion on your part.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thisisnpr/...-sanity-or-colbert-s-march-to-keep-fear-alive

Is journalistic integrity that foreign to some of you people?

And look at the two morons who immediately agreed with your false and self-serving conclusion, Captain. I trust it serves sufficiently well as a "you are here" moment on the perspective map.
More...

speaking of morons, one just arrived.

juan has said many, many more opinionated things on the factor in the past, often against the right and in support of obama. nothing happened to him then. why now?
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

speaking of morons, one just arrived.

juan has said many, many more opinionated things on the factor in the past, often against the right and in support of obama. nothing happened to him then. why now?
More...
Speaking about yourself in the third person is cause for concern. Seek help.

I don't watch the factor, so I cannot comment. However, I do know from this thread alone that you lack basic objectivity. Therefore, any observation on your part is immediately and correctly suspect. Perhaps Williams was giving an assessment of facts in the exchanges to which you refer: analysis and interpretation. Such opinions are of a different order than the one he expressed which got him in trouble. If you cannot discern the difference then perhaps you are not yet ready for adulthood. These things take time. More so for some than others.
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

Why did you leave out the paragraph that was nestled in between the two you quoted:
More...
Seemed like a good idea at the time.

At least NPR agrees with all things liberal
More...
 I see why you so passionately defend them.

As an aside, Lucrum, your continued and unrelenting preoccupation with all things gay is making my nipples hard again.
More...
That's a little too much information there thunderpussy.
 
I think Lucrum demonstrates true self-sufficiency in his ability to carry on an exchange entirely by himself. Most impressive.
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

Here, perhaps this will help you pull your head out of your context:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2010/01/loud_protests_on_nprs_tea_part_1.html
More...

Here ya go, Fister In Chief:

NPR: Where “Teabag” Videos Are Defended But Blaming 9-11 on Muslims Will Get You Fired
Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, October 21, 2010, 6:22 AM

National Public Radio used taxpayer dollars to bash teabaggers on their website–

“Learn to Speak Teabag”

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QCqQRflUWd4&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QCqQRflUWd4&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>

After a controversy erupted over this nasty liberal cartoon last year NPR posted a response on their website. NPR executives said they would not apologize for the cartoon by Mark Fiore, nor would they remove it from the NPR site. NPR did however enlarge the word “OPINION” on the page where Fiore’s cartoon appears and labeled it his “personal take” on the issue.

Byron York wrote more on the controversy at The Washington Examiner including this:
So there will be no apology, no withdrawal, and no further steps to provide balance in commentary. Right now, what balance there is can be found in the comments section. “This should be on the Democratic National Committee website,” one California listener wrote. “Why did NPR allow this? I’ll tell you why. The people who allowed it have the same views.”
More...

Indeed. They didn’t see anything wrong with it because they agreed with it.

Last night NPR fired Juan Williams for admitting that he gets nervous when he sees Muslims on an airplane.
Unbelievable.

P.J. Salvatore at Big Journalism has more evidence of blatant bigotry allowed on NPR.
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

Speaking about yourself in the third person is cause for concern. Seek help.

I don't watch the factor, so I cannot comment. However, I do know from this thread alone that you lack basic objectivity. Therefore, any observation on your part is immediately and correctly suspect. Perhaps Williams was giving an assessment of facts in the exchanges to which you refer: analysis and interpretation. Such opinions are of a different order than the one he expressed which got him in trouble. If you cannot discern the difference then perhaps you are not yet ready for adulthood. These things take time. More so for some than others.
More...

Your haughty, holier than thou, condescending, arrogance is absolutely breathtaking Gayfly1.

How DO you do it?
 
Quote from bugscoe:

...Unbelievable...
More...
Those who laud FOX forfeit all rights to feigned indignation and moral outrage. Look it up.

Further, if you cannot separate context, along with time and place, then you are not really advocating one position over another. Rather, you are either a mercenary or a drone. Which ever of the two you may be, there can be no meaningful exchanges with either mercenaries or drones.
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

Those who laud FOX forfeit all rights to feigned indignation and moral outrage. Look it up.

Further, if you cannot separate context, along with time and place, then you are not really advocating one position over another. Rather, you are either a mercenary or a drone. Which ever of the two you may be, there can be no meaningful exchanges with either mercenaries or drones.
More...

Duck and cover. It's all you do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top