Nothing to see here, just government appointed shills hurting democracy.

Trump’s Voter Fraud Commission Is Imploding
A Democratic member is suing his colleagues, alleging they’re violating federal law.


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...mp_s_voter_fraud_commission_is_imploding.html

It is hard to make the case the Voter Fraud Commission is imploding based on this article, you can make the case the commission needs to clean up its operations to ensure all documents are shared with all commission members as required by federal regulations.

The use of private email addresses brought up in the article is not an issue. Federal commission members are not provided with federal email addresses, they are expected to use private email addresses. So this is not even an "issue" - just political spin from Slate.
 
http://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article209268109.html
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...f-citizenship-voting-registration-requirement

However, the AP reported:

"The evidence shows only three instances in Kansas where non-citizens voted in a federal election between 1995 and 2013, and about 14 non-citizens attempted to register during that time. The court noted the 'magnitude of harm' caused by 18,372 applicants at motor vehicle offices who were denied registration due to the state's proof-of-citizenship law."

In her decision, Robinson wrote that "even if instances of non-citizens voting cause indirect voter disenfranchisement by diluting the votes of citizens, such instances pale in comparison to the number of qualified citizens who have been disenfranchised by this law."
 
It is hard to make the case the Voter Fraud Commission is imploding based on this article, you can make the case the commission needs to clean up its operations to ensure all documents are shared with all commission members as required by federal regulations.

The use of private email addresses brought up in the article is not an issue. Federal commission members are not provided with federal email addresses, they are expected to use private email addresses. So this is not even an "issue" - just political spin from Slate.

Never forget this is what you championed GWB:

upload_2022-2-24_19-4-9.png

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rea...sets-voters-trouble-casting/story?id=83027396
upload_2022-2-24_19-2-37.png
upload_2022-2-24_19-3-40.png


More voter fraud...

Hundreds of Texans may have voted improperly
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/18/hundreds-texans-may-have-voted-improperly.html

AUSTIN, Texas – Texas election officials acknowledge that hundreds of people were allowed to bypass the state's toughest-in-the-nation voter ID law and improperly cast ballots in the presidential election by signing a sworn statement instead of showing a photo ID.

The chief election officers in two of Texas' largest counties are considering whether to refer cases to prosecutors for possible charges. Officials in many other areas say they'll let the mistakes go. They say there was widespread confusion among poll workers and voters.

The law requires voters to show one of seven approved forms of identification. It was softened in August to allow people without a driver's license or other photo ID to sign an affidavit declaring that they have an impediment to obtaining required identification.
Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/

A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, revealed its number-crunching in a report on national immigration.

Just Facts President James D. Agresti and his team looked at data from an extensive Harvard/YouGov study that every two years questions a sample size of tens of thousands of voters. Some acknowledge they are noncitizens and are thus ineligible to vote.

Just Facts’ conclusions confront both sides in the illegal voting debate: those who say it happens a lot and those who say the problem nonexistent.

In one camp, there are groundbreaking studies by professors at Old Dominion University in Virginia who attempted to compile scientifically derived illegal voting numbers using the Harvard data, called the Cooperative Congressional Election Study.

On the other side are the professors who conducted the study and contended that “zero” noncitizens of about 18 million adults in the U.S. voted. The liberal mainstream media adopted this position and proclaimed the Old Dominion work was “debunked.”

The ODU professors, who stand by their work in the face of attacks from the left, concluded that in 2008 as few as 38,000 and as many as 2.8 million noncitizens voted.

Mr. Agresti’s analysis of the same polling data settled on much higher numbers. He estimated that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered that year and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted.

These numbers are more in line with the unverified estimates given by President Trump, who said the number of ballots cast by noncitizens was the reason he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton.

Last month, the president signed an executive order setting up a commission to try to find on-the-ground truth in illegal voting. Headed by Vice President Mike Pence, the panel also will look at outdated voter lists across the nation with names of dead people and multiple registrants.

For 2012, Just Facts said, 3.2 million to 5.6 million noncitizens were registered to vote and 1.2 million to 3.6 million of them voted.

Mr. Agresti lays out his reasoning in a series of complicated calculations, which he compares to U.S. Census Bureau figures for noncitizen residents. Polls show noncitizens vote overwhelmingly Democratic.

“The details are technical, but the figure I calculated is based on a more conservative margin of sampling error and a methodology that I consider to be more accurate,” Mr. Agresti told The Washington Times.

He believes the Harvard/YouGov researchers based their “zero” claim on two flawed assumptions. First, they assumed that people who said they voted and identified a candidate did not vote unless their names showed up in a database.

“This is illogical, because such databases are unlikely to verify voters who use fraudulent identities, and millions of noncitizens use them,” Mr. Agresti said.

He cites government audits that show large numbers of noncitizens use false IDs and Social Security numbers in order to function in the U.S., which could include voting.

Second, Harvard assumed that respondent citizens sometimes misidentified themselves as noncitizens but also concluded that noncitizens never misidentified themselves as citizens, Mr. Agresti said.

“This is irrational, because illegal immigrants often claim they are citizens in order to conceal the fact that they are in the U.S. illegally,” he said.

Some of the polled noncitizens denied they were registered to vote when publicly available databases show that they were, he said.

This conclusion, he said, is backed by the Harvard/YouGov study’s findings of consumer and vote data matches for 90 percent of participants but only 41 percent of noncitizen respondents.

As to why his numbers are higher than the besieged ODU professors’ study, Mr. Agresti said: “I calculated the margin of sampling error in a more cautious way to ensure greater confidence in the results, and I used a slightly different methodology that I think is more accurate.”

There is hard evidence outside of polling that noncitizens do vote. Conservative activists have conducted limited investigations in Maryland and Virginia that found thousands of aliens were registered.

These inquiries, such as comparing noncitizen jury pool rejections to voter rolls, captured just a snapshot. But conservatives say they show there is a much broader problem that a comprehensive probe by the Pence commission could uncover.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation, which fights voter fraud, released one of its most comprehensive reports last month.

Its investigation found that Virginia removed more than 5,500 noncitizens from voter lists, including 1,852 people who had cast more than 7,000 ballots. The people volunteered their status, most likely when acquiring driver’s licenses. The Public Interest Legal Foundation said there are likely many more illegal voters on Virginia’s rolls who have never admitted to being noncitizens.
Stopping voter fraud and enabling legal voting are not conflicting values.
If voter ID laws were created to suppress minority voting, they're actually not doing that
http://reason.com/blog/2015/07/17/voter-id-suppression-fail

"This was a racist attack on our sacred right to vote," North Carolina NAACP President Rev. William Barber declared earlier this week. Barber was denouncing some recent changes to North Carolina's election laws, which are being challenged in the federal court case NAACP vs. McCrory. The changes, Barber said, are "the worst voter suppression law we've seen since the 1960s."

Among other things, the new North Carolina law eliminated same-day voter registration, cut back early voting, and ended pre-registration of eligible high school students. But the main objection to the changes involves the requirement that voters show photo identification at polling places. In its brief, the NAACP argues that African Americans are "disproportionately" affected by this requirement. The brief also claims that the new laws were "enacted with the intention of suppressing the number of votes cast by African-Americans."

My general view is that voting should be made easier, although as we'll see, there is precious little evidence that it makes any significant difference in electoral results. I also don't have much regard for the idea that we need tighter voter ID laws to prevent voter fraud, since most research shows that voter-impersonation fraud is extremely rare.

But if the intent of the new laws really is to suppress minority group voting, it's not likely to work. There has been a lot of academic research recently on the effects of stricter voter ID requirements, and—contrary to Barber's apocalyptic statements—they don't seem to have much of an impact on minority turnout at all.

Take "The Politics of Race and Voter ID Laws in the States: The Return of Jim Crow?," a 2013 study published in the Political Research Quarterly. In it, political scientists Rene Rocha and Tetsuya Matsubayashi find that states in which Republicans hold a majority in the legislature and the governorship are more likely to adopt strict voter ID laws. (And so it was in North Carolina when the new laws were adopted.) Then they look at how changes in electoral rules may have affected voter turnout by comparing election results before and after voter ID law changes in 49 states between 1980 and 2010.

"Our primary explanatory variables, photo ID and nonphoto ID laws, have no statistically discernible relationship with the probability that whites, blacks, and Latinos voted in the general elections between 1980 and 2010 except that the nonphoto ID law has a positive and significant relationship with Latino turnout," they find. "In short, more stringent ID requirements for voting have no deterring effect on individual turnout across different racial and ethnic groups."


(More at above url)

Note: I live in North Carolina and we regularly endure the antics of North Carolina NAACP President Rev. Barber quoted in the first paragraph.. IMO he continually stirs the racial pot for his personal benefit. He also needs to stay away from the buffet line.

William-Barber-Arrest.jpeg
This will reduce voter fraud. About time!
I live in an upper-middle class area of Cary, North Carolina.

During major elections (2008, 2012) we have large buses full of people from ghetto areas showing to vote at our precinct. The people from the buses appear to have lots of confusion over their real names because they keep needing to refer to papers in line before getting to the registrar table to know their own names. I (and others) have complained about this in the past but nothing has ever been investigated or done (by the Democratic-controlled election board).

Of course the bus goes around to multiple precincts all day as part of a Democratic funded "get out the vote" drive. They even give them gift cards at the end of the ride.

Time for a picture voter id law to be put into practice. Tired of the endless fraud.
This is one ruling. It is hard to state that this is an example of a voter ID laws getting crushed.

I support the requirement to provide a picture ID when an individual votes. It is hard to make a case that there is "no or very limited fraud" when the election boards do not spend any time addressing fraud when it is reported. There are many cases of obvious fraud that made the news with people getting arrested for it; just from the obvious media reports alone any attempt to state voter fraud is a "phantom" is absurd.

The issues driving the overturn of most voter ID laws is because GOP went too far and threw-in a complete list of other restrictive measures; limiting early voting, removing college campuses as polling locations, over-turning motor-voter laws, changing absentee requirements, and many other limiting measures. Most Voter ID laws are being over-turned in court due to these other measures, not because of the picture id requirement to vote. If the state Republicans had even minimal common sense they would have simply stuck with the picture id rule in the laws they passed and not piled on all the other restrictive measures. Certainly constitutional lawyers must have been telling them all along that the overloaded laws would never hold up in court.
What an absurd and meaningless article. I will tell you what happened to "Democratic turnout machine".

States put measures into place to reduce voter fraud and the "Democratic turnout machine" crumbled.

I provided the best local example in my post - Eliminating Straight Ticket Voting Reduces Election Fraud
That is a matter of perspective. From my perspective, the Republicans are trying via voter id laws to stop election fraud.
North Carolina is basically a Democratic machine. For the past 100 years until 2010, Democrats held the state legislature. For most of this time, Democrats also held the governors mansion. Many of these Democrats have been indicted by the Feds for corruption including a recent governor (Easley) and over 30 members of the state legislature.

North Carolina also experiences a significant amount of voter fraud driven by the Democratic party. The Board of Elections (also Democratic controlled) never investigates or follows-up on obvious reports of fraud... leaving many residents in our state frustrated that "one person - one vote" does not really exist in North Carolina.

Finally Republicans took over legislature in 2010 and have Voter Id as on of the key items on their agenda. Unfortunately our current criminal Democratic governor Bev Purdue (she will be indicted when she leaves office - and her own party rejected having her run again) vetoed the Voter ID bill. I can only hope that the 2012 general election is not a repeat of the wide-spread fraud we experienced in 2008.

Democrats attempt to make out Voter ID as a "voter suppression" issue. In reality Voter ID is an issue about preventing continual fraud in our election system and validating that "one person - one vote" holds true.

I will also note that earlier studies confirmed that North Carolina had over 900,000 voters on our rolls that did not have driver's licenses or any other form of id in our state.
 

So how is anything to are referencing related to what is currently happening in Texas in any matter. Totally distinct and separate situations.

The best you can find are posts from way back in 2014, etc. about cleaning up the voting lists to comply with federal regulations put in place by the Obama administration. And my support of requiring a voter id and that election boards should actually properly address individual complaints of voter fraud rather than ignoring them.
 
So how is anything to are referencing related to what is currently happening in Texas in any matter. Totally distinct and separate situations.

The best you can find are posts from way back in 2014, etc. about cleaning up the voting lists to comply with federal regulations put in place by the Obama administration. And my support of requiring a voter id and that election boards should actually properly address individual complaints of voter fraud rather than ignoring them.
COPE
O
P
E

just as you championed voter ID laws for a decade (I just didn't feel like posting most recent ones), leading to voter disenfranchisement, you now champion anti-CRT nothingburgers that will be used to redirect public education funds to private schools.

It's best to admit you have a horrid track record and toe the GQP line 9 times out of 10
 
Back
Top