Quote from Rob227:
I somehow doubt they include sexual preference in school application forms.
Do they let male's visit female rooms or the other way around? Because it was a visitor that the dead roomate was filmed with.
I think you guys are too caught up on the homosexual aspect of the case and less to do with the fact that the guy's privacy was violated and he was maliciously exposed. Even if Ravi had filmed his roomate in some encouter with a female from school it would be wrong to secretly film it and then distribute that. I don't know why peil you would suggest that nothing wrong was done when he's being charged with breaking various laws and the admition to what he has done is not even in question. Take off the homophobic blinders and look at the details of why this guy is facing jail time.
Ravi's malicious actions unfortunately turned into something far worse than he likely expected. It seems like a mean spirited prank on his part contributed to his roomate's death and now he will have to face the consequences of that. I doubt Ravi meant physical harm to come to his roomate and he was careless in not considering the consequences of his actions but in my view ten years is far too long a sentence for what he has done.
A good, sane, analysis. I think the dead kid was responsible for his own death, obviously, and the simple act of spying on any sexual activity and then distributing it is not a 10 year sentence IMO. A very disturbing event, for all involved. Very sad. And, I too, wish others would get past the homophobia, heck, nothing new there. It is what it is, nothing others can do about it.
c