Quote from thenewguy:
I really don't think video cards are tested in way that is useful for trading. I assume it's because windows 2D graphics is considered a "dead issue", and it's all about 3D graphics these days. Also, what type of user other than a trader is going to notice a 100ms delay twice a day? When that delay comes at a fed release (which inevitably it does) they are going to notice, but I know of no other user that is going to notice that. 3D rendering is very memory intensive, but usually a constant memory burn, which is much more easily measured and quantified. If your card operates at %20 memory usage %99 of the time, that's considered perfect for most users. For traders, it's how it performs during that %1 slowdown period that really makes the difference.
Stealth trader,
To clarify what you interpreted as me twisting facts around to suite my needs, the installation as I understand it is one monitor on an 8MB card, and three monitors on a 128MB card. If I were installing a new set up for one of our traders at our office I would absolutely go with two monitors on a 256MB card and another two on a seperate 256MB card. It has been my experience that that set up will have a performance advantage over the current set up.
Thanks,
- The New Guy
Once again, what does this have to do with the original posters issue? It's already been established that his current setup is adequate for his needs. What you believe or would do is totally irrelevant.
st

