Wow, you love visualizing and talking about gay male sex. Why don't you just come out of the closet already?
Not approved by CNN, CNBC and the like
- Thread starter Ditch
- Start date
That's for you and db_phoenix to talk about at the Ferguson rallies. Maybe you can get a two for one on the "I Can't Breathe" t-shirts.
The homoerotic fantasies of you righties are both icky and predictable. How sad for you.
Last edited:
This isn't some video compilation of extreme islamofascist views. It is all straight out of the Koran and completely normal behavior as viewed either historically or contemporaneously. It is classical Islam and it is not going to stop.
You cannot reason with them. Could you be reasoned with to give up your faith?
You cannot negotiate coexistence with them. Their very core beliefs obligate them to subdue non-muslims and subjugate them.
They view the conflict existentially. We had better start thinking along those lines as well.
You cannot reason with them. Could you be reasoned with to give up your faith?
You cannot negotiate coexistence with them. Their very core beliefs obligate them to subdue non-muslims and subjugate them.
They view the conflict existentially. We had better start thinking along those lines as well.
I think this is pretty accurate. While only a small percentage commit actual acts of terrorism, there can be little doubt that a substantial proportion, probably a majority, approve of those acts and facilitate them in ways large and small. Some do it for religious grounds, others because they can't get past the Israel issue. Whatever.
The problem on the world stage is large. In France it is daunting because of the sheer numbers and the kid gloves policy the french government has adopted, ie somewhat similar to our policy toward hispanic illegals. We face a more manageable situation, at least for now.
It seems clear that the single best way to avoid problems with muslims is to restrict the number who are allowed to move into your country. A good number would be zero. Some are fine people who have suffered hardship. I personally know some and I would trust them with my life. However, policy cannot be made on the basis of personal anecdotes. We know two things. One, as the percentage of muslims rises, problems increase exponentially because of their desire to create a separate governing structure. Two, some percentage of muslims will become violent terrorists. The more muslims, the more terrorists.
So a wise policy designed to protect our country would severely limit muslim immigration. Refugee resettlements, eg from places like syria, pose the biggest problem because a lot of the refugees bring grudges with them and are easily radicalized. They are a lot more likely to pose problems than a jordanian physician.
The civil liberties crowd will object and say this is religious discrimination. They have a point, although islam is more a system of government with religious overtones than a traditional religion. Accordingly, special treatement is not inappropriate. More fundamentally, foreigners looking to move here have no Constitutional claim for equal rights, etc. In short, if we wish to bar them on religious grounds, we can do so.
Winston Churchill understood............
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman mustbelong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die: but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_River_War
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman mustbelong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die: but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_River_War
Churchill, however, was not speaking out of a lack of self-interest. One might put all this in context and ask what Churchill in particular and Britain in general were doing in the Sudan in the first place.
I suspect neither are you nor the president nor the left nor anyone else.
it seems we all have agendas.
once again I find myself asking a leftist to discuss the substance of the message and not the messenger.
it seems we all have agendas.
once again I find myself asking a leftist to discuss the substance of the message and not the messenger.