Not all Oregonians feeling the love for the Portland area dem psychos.

The following is a hypothetical interview with the Portland, OR mayor:

Beautiful Stranger(BS) - Are you concerned about the increase of shootings in the Portland, OR metro area?

Portland, OR Mayor (POM) - This is a very poorly worded, racist question that assumes facts that have not be established. For example, even using the word “Shooting” is inappropriate unless its context is considered. Further, the misuse of that word is tantamount to gaslighting and political repression. As such, for the purposes of Portland area “Public discharge of a firearm with projectile hitting person”(PDFPHP) statistics, certain acts involving discharging of a firearm shall not be considered as “Shooting”. For example, any PDFPHP that has the potential to impugn the reputation of a Democrat politician shall be considered “Firearm used contrary to der Kommissar’s established directives”(FUCKED) and is prima fascia evidence the firearm was used for subversive political purposes and counted as PDFPHP, not as a shooting for Federal statistic reporting purposes.

BS - How do you currently feel about gun control?

POM - Now that we have taken a considerable number of law enforcement off the street, better. However, much work remains in confiscating firearms from law abiding citizens.

BS - I noticed you did not include “Criminals” in your goal to confiscate firearms.

POM - Obviously, anyone using firearms in the politically subversive manner mentioned before is a criminal who would be subject to losing their firearm.

BS - How about those who commit arson, looting, discharging of firearms, and vandalism while rioting?

POM - Again, context is key. Are they rioting for Civil Rights, against evil corporations, or Donald Trump? Or are they being subversive?

BS - Thank you for an enlightening interview.

POM - Anytime.
Stranger, you should use some of your 'composition time' to view 2000 Mules if you are indeed as interested in that situation as your previous thread would indicate. This type of compostional analysis of the good, bad and ugly of that documentary would be hella more appreciated than this cotton candy fluff.
Is that why you have never watched or at least to my knowledge admitted to watching it? The expectations of your response?
If not, why not?


delete.jpg
 
'At wits' end': Portland sees exodus of families, chased out by city's growing homeless camps
https://www.theblaze.com/news/portl...s-camps-encroach-on-residential-neighborhoods

Yes indeed.

Portland is yet another city that the progressives have "improved" to the point where it is no longer liveable.

You see this elk statue below? The city removed it because the protesters kept lighting fires under it and trying to damage it. The reason that the protesters hated it was because it was given to the City- I dunno- say, a hundred years ago- by some rich guy who loved the City of Portland and wanted to express that. I guess the protesters want to replace it with statues of little black girls giving people the finger or maybe put up a bronze of Stacy Abrams.

The Apple computer store is still there but now looks like an American embassy in Mogadishu due to the security fences around it. - below.

Toto. We are not in Kansas anymore.

The first time I was in Portland many years ago, I hopped a boxcar in Tacoma and rode down. Did not have two nickels to rub together. Nice city. Lots of lib chicks who as we all know are easy, and had a great time. Pretty grubby now. The people included. At least the visible ones. The occupiers.

1200px-PortlandElkStatue.jpg


F3SSEJYRGZED5HICT6UQ7627AI.JPG
 
Last edited:
Portland got a lifetime pass on the CrazyTrain baby. Ride on It, Ride on It.
Plan your next vaca for there, weather's great Sept, Oct. Pack your kevlar, your
mask, and your helmet!
Good Times! Invigorating!
 
Back
Top