Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

The chart clearly shows the result of the Doran/Zimmerman study (P.S. it is from the later Zimmerman study summary). What does the results of the study which ignored nearly 3000 results to come up with a 97% figure (75 out of 77) have to do with your rant below. We all know who Doran is.

Here is a link to the original Doran/Zimmerman survey study that is outlined in the chart.
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

drownpruf said:
You are such an incredible tool, it's actually comical.

P.T. Doran, the author of the paper you cite:

Peter Doran, Ph.D. is Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago.[1]
Doran specializes in polar regions, especially Antarctic climate and ecosystems. Doran was the lead author of a research paper about Antarctic temperatures that was published in the journal Nature in January 2002. Because he and his colleagues found that some parts of Antarctica had cooled between 1964 and 2000, his paper has been frequently cited by opponents of the global warming theory, such as Ann Coulter and Michael Crichton. In an opinion piece in the July 27, 2006 New York Times, Doran characterized this as a "misinterpretation" and stated, "I have never thought such a thing ... I would like to remove my name from the list of scientists who dispute global warming." [2] (The temporary phenomenon is related to the "hole" in the ozone. As the "hole heals" the Antarctic will dramatically warm quickly. )
Doran and his grad student Maggie Kendall Zimmerman also published a paper in the Jan 27, 2009 issue of EOS showing that active climate researchers almost unanimously agree that humans have had a significant impact on the Earth's climate.
Both an Antarctic stream and glacier were named for Doran by the U.S. Geological Survey to commemorate his many significant research contributions conducted on the continent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Doran
More...
 
gwb-trading said:
There is only ONE --- read it again ONE survey that showed a 97% result. And this only occurred when Doran/Zimmerman trimmed the 3146 respondents down to 77 which they magically declared to be "climatologists". Of these 75, agreed with two questions - leading to their 97% figure.

Read it again - there is only ONE survey that somehow played with the result data to arrive at "97%" - there are NO other surveys providing this result.

BTW reading an abstract for a paper and inferring a scientists position on global warming is not a survey.
More...

No, you are wrong. Read it again. You are wrong. Multiple surveys of literature and by direct polling of scientists.

97% Even NASA says so...

"Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources."
 
jem said:
fraudcurrents posts b.s.

this is reality...



98_percent_climate_scientists_graph.png




which is why a peer reviewed paper found that only 41 out of 11000 papers supported the consensus nutters like fraudcurrents support.
More...

Yes, and 97% of the climatologists agreed, just as all the other surveys.
 
gwb-trading said:
The chart clearly shows the result of the Doran/Zimmerman study (P.S. it is from the later Zimmerman study summary). What does the results of the study which ignored nearly 3000 results to come up with a 97% figure (75 out of 77) have to do with your rant below. We all know who Doran is.

Here is a link to the original Doran/Zimmerman survey study that is outlined in the chart.
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf
More...


Tweeddledumber arrives just in time. 90%? 97%? Don't care... the fact remains that you fools are citing a guy who states that your party misrepresented the data. The guy is THE global warming alarmist!

lol are you suggesting that Zimmerman is in disagreement with her prof? hahaha

I love it so. The difference between Coulter and you (and Jem) is that Coulter has a bigger c*ck.
 
first of all stu and fraudcurrents are tweedle dum and tweedle dee.
which one are you.?

secondly... click on the link you illiterate drone.
read the study for yourself... it matches the graph.
 
gwb-trading said:
Point to another survey with a 97% result. Just ONE other - provide the url.

And I mean a SURVEY not a sampling of paper abstracts to infer a AGW position.
More...


Already have. All the surveys and polls of the top climate experts show it's 97%. You just refuse to see it.
 
I have no problem with the science of evolution of living things.
I just point out that there is no proof life evolved from non life here on the earth.

I follow the science not like agw morons.
If you have proof that man made co2 causing warming I invite you to present it.
It will be a now failed computer model.

learn some of this science before you post leftist horsecrap.

sle said:
Dude, you are arguing with regligious nuts. They don't understand scientific evidence, they don't believe in evolution. I am sure they even think that gravity is a myth - Jews invented it so people would drop their lose change.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top