Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
so far this has been the nicest winter in San Diego in years. Maybe I should not fear a little average global cooling.
Senior meteorologist on extended USA cold blast to last past Groundhog day: ‘WOW F..ing WOW’
Posted on January 21, 2014 by Anthony Watts
Normally quiet and reserved WeatherBell senior forecaster Joe D’Aleo (co-founder of the Weather Channel with John Coleman) almost never writes like this. When he does, it gets my attention. A new forecast shows the cold blast in the eastern half of the USA extending well past Groundhog Day, Feb 2nd, according to their models. WeatherBell has had an excellent track record this winter so far. He says he hasn’t seen anything like it since 1918 when the big flu pandemic hit the USA. Have a look:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/01/...ded-usa-cold-blast-wow-f-ing-wow/#more-101882
Senior meteorologist on extended USA cold blast to last past Groundhog day: ‘WOW F..ing WOW’
Posted on January 21, 2014 by Anthony Watts
Normally quiet and reserved WeatherBell senior forecaster Joe D’Aleo (co-founder of the Weather Channel with John Coleman) almost never writes like this. When he does, it gets my attention. A new forecast shows the cold blast in the eastern half of the USA extending well past Groundhog Day, Feb 2nd, according to their models. WeatherBell has had an excellent track record this winter so far. He says he hasn’t seen anything like it since 1918 when the big flu pandemic hit the USA. Have a look:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/01/...ded-usa-cold-blast-wow-f-ing-wow/#more-101882
If you vote for me for President, I'll get us out of the UN immediately!
More lies from the agw nutters...
Michael Mann caught in lies in court papers... he was never exonerated from climategate as the "finding" was specifically directed to CRU scientsts... which he was not.
He lied about this just as he lied about being a nobel prize winner.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/...aught-in-a-quote-fabrication-fib/#more-103640
In their memoranda supporting their original motions to dismiss, both National Review and CEI had observed (correctly) that the Muir Russell panel had limited their findings to âCRU scientistsâ and contested Mannâs assertion that the Muir Russell panel had made any findings regarding Mann himself, let alone âexoneratedâ him.
In Mannâs Reply Memorandum, he vociferously rejected the (correct) assertion that the Muir Russell had not exonerated Mann himself, describing such assertion as merely an attempt to âobfuscate and misrepresentâ. Mann supported this bluster with an apparent quotation from the Muir Russell report, but the phrase within the quotation marks does not actually occur within the Muir Russell report. As shown below, Mann and/or his lawyers subtly altered the quotation to more supportive language.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/...aught-in-a-quote-fabrication-fib/#more-103640
Michael Mann caught in lies in court papers... he was never exonerated from climategate as the "finding" was specifically directed to CRU scientsts... which he was not.
He lied about this just as he lied about being a nobel prize winner.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/...aught-in-a-quote-fabrication-fib/#more-103640
In their memoranda supporting their original motions to dismiss, both National Review and CEI had observed (correctly) that the Muir Russell panel had limited their findings to âCRU scientistsâ and contested Mannâs assertion that the Muir Russell panel had made any findings regarding Mann himself, let alone âexoneratedâ him.
In Mannâs Reply Memorandum, he vociferously rejected the (correct) assertion that the Muir Russell had not exonerated Mann himself, describing such assertion as merely an attempt to âobfuscate and misrepresentâ. Mann supported this bluster with an apparent quotation from the Muir Russell report, but the phrase within the quotation marks does not actually occur within the Muir Russell report. As shown below, Mann and/or his lawyers subtly altered the quotation to more supportive language.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/...aught-in-a-quote-fabrication-fib/#more-103640
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/24/us-usa-court-climate-idUSBREA1N06Q20140224
Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court appeared closely divided on Monday as it weighed whether the administration of President Barack Obama exceeded its authority when crafting the nation's first greenhouse gas emissions regulations.
Justice Anthony Kennedy could hold the swing vote on the nine-member high court, with conservative justices skeptical of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approach and liberal justices generally supportive.
It is possible the court could opt for a compromise in which the EPA loses the case but retains most of its authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the specific program at issue in the case. Such a move could potentially win the support of some liberal justices.
Absent congressional action, Obama has been using his regulatory authority to address climate change. The Clean Air Act has been the EPA's main tool for addressing emissions since the U.S. Senate rejected a cap-and-trade bill in 2010.
Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court appeared closely divided on Monday as it weighed whether the administration of President Barack Obama exceeded its authority when crafting the nation's first greenhouse gas emissions regulations.
Justice Anthony Kennedy could hold the swing vote on the nine-member high court, with conservative justices skeptical of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approach and liberal justices generally supportive.
It is possible the court could opt for a compromise in which the EPA loses the case but retains most of its authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the specific program at issue in the case. Such a move could potentially win the support of some liberal justices.
Absent congressional action, Obama has been using his regulatory authority to address climate change. The Clean Air Act has been the EPA's main tool for addressing emissions since the U.S. Senate rejected a cap-and-trade bill in 2010.
Even your God agrees that you're a f*cking turd.
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...s-on-global-warming-9136-agree-one-disagrees/
that article in scientific american is absurd. its a actually a disgusting lie
the article states this...
"Itâs worth noting how many authors agree with the basic fact of global warming â more than nine thousand. And thatâs just in a single year. Now I understand as well as anyone else that consensus does not imply truth but I find it odd how there arenât even a handful of scientists who deny global warming presumably because the global warming mafia threatens to throttle them if they do. Itâs not like we are seeing a 70-30% split, or even a 90-10% split. No, the split is more like 99.99-0.01%."
I will find the link the link to the papers... and present the first 100...
you will see the majority of them probably have nothing to do with whether man made co2 is causing warming or not.
the article states this...
"Itâs worth noting how many authors agree with the basic fact of global warming â more than nine thousand. And thatâs just in a single year. Now I understand as well as anyone else that consensus does not imply truth but I find it odd how there arenât even a handful of scientists who deny global warming presumably because the global warming mafia threatens to throttle them if they do. Itâs not like we are seeing a 70-30% split, or even a 90-10% split. No, the split is more like 99.99-0.01%."
I will find the link the link to the papers... and present the first 100...
you will see the majority of them probably have nothing to do with whether man made co2 is causing warming or not.