Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Co2ClimateChangeAndFossilFuel.jpg



CO2 IS A GREENHOUSE GAS. IT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE TEMPERATURE OF THE EARTH. THE LEVELS OF CO2 ACT LIKE THE SETTING ON A THERMOSTAT. THE HIGHER THE LEVELS THE HIGHER THE TEMPERATURE. THIS PROVEN BY THE HISTORICAL RECORD.

THE LEVEL OF CO2 HAS GONE UP 40% IN THE LAST TWO HUNDRED YEARS FROM THE BURNING OF FOSSIL FUELS

THUS THE TEMPS HAVE ALSO GONE UP AND CONTINUE TO GO UP WITHOUT SLOWING.

IT'S A CONCEPT SO SIMPLE A TEN YEAR OLD CAN UNDERSTAND IT. SO OF COURSE, REPUBLICANS CAN'T. THAT'S HOW FUCKING STUPID THEY ARE.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Oh wow what a surprise, another paid by the Koch bros denialist propaganda machine website brought to you by the fossil fuel interests.

You guys are such gullible idiots.

So you have no comments to refute the scientists who state very directrly that Cook mis-classified their papers.

All you can do is throw out more absurd character assassination and name calling.

So bottom line - everthing stated about the fabrications in Cook's paper is correct and you have nothing in your bag of tricks to show otherwise.

P.S. - You do know that Cook is a cartoonist and NOT a scientist.
http://web.archive.org/web/20071213172906/www.skepticalscience.com/page.php?p=3

"This site was created by John Cook. I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist"
 
THE KOCH BROTHERS: FUNDING $67,042,064 TO GROUPS DENYING CLIMATE CHANGE SCIENCE SINCE 1997.

Billionaire oilman David Koch used to joke that Koch Industries was "the biggest company you've never heard of." Now the shroud of secrecy has thankfully been lifted, revealing the $67 million that he and his brother Charles have quietly funneled to climate-denial front groups that are working to delay policies and regulations aimed at stopping global warming, most of which are part of the State Policy Network.

Today, the Kochs are being watched as a prime example of the corporate takeover of government. Their funding and co-opting of the Tea Party movement is now well documented.

Charles G. Koch and David H. Koch have a vested interest in delaying climate action: they've made billions from their ownership and control of Koch Industries, an oil corporation that is the second largest privately-held company in America (which also happens to have an especially poor environmental record). It's timely that more people are now aware of Charles and David Koch and just what they're up to. A growing awareness of these oil billionaires' destructive agenda has led to increased scrutiny and resistance from people and organizations all over the United States.


http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries/
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

So you have no comments to refute the scientists who state very directrly that Cook mis-classified their papers.

All you can do is throw out more absurd character assassination and name calling.

So bottom line - everthing stated about the fabrications in Cook's paper is correct and you have nothing in your bag of tricks to show otherwise.

P.S. - You do know that Cook is a cartoonist and NOT a scientist.
http://web.archive.org/web/20071213172906/www.skepticalscience.com/page.php?p=3

"This site was created by John Cook. I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist"



97%
 
Climate change denial is a set of organized attempts to downplay, deny or dismiss the scientific consensus on the extent of global warming, its significance, and its connection to human behavior, especially for commercial or ideological reasons.[1][2] Typically, these attempts take the rhetorical form of legitimate scientific debate, while not adhering to the actual principles of that debate.[3][4] Climate change denial has been associated with the fossil fuels lobby, industry advocates and free market think tanks, often in the United States.[5][6][7][8][9] Some commentators describe climate change denial as a particular form of denialism.[10][11][12][13][14][15]
Peter Christoff, writing in The Age in 2007, said that climate change denial differs from skepticism, which is essential for good science. "Almost two decades after the issue became one of global concern, the 'big' debate over climate change is over. There are now no credible scientific skeptics challenging the underlying scientific theory, or the broad projections, of climate change."[14] The relationship between industry-funded denial and public climate change skepticism has been compared to earlier efforts by the tobacco industry to undermine scientific evidence on the dangers of secondhand smoke, and linked as a direct continuation of these earlier financial relationships.[16] Aside from private industry groups, climate change denial has also been alleged regarding the statements of elected officials.[17]
Although there is a scientific consensus that humans are warming the climate system,[18] the politics of global warming combined with some of the debate in popular media has slowed global efforts at preventing future global warming as well as preparing for warming "in the pipeline" due to past emissions. Much of this debate focuses on the economics of global warming.
Some commentators have criticized the use of the phrase climate change denial as an attempt to delegitimize 'skeptical' views and portray them as immoral.[19][20][21] Numerous authors, including several scholars, say that various conservative think tanks, corporations and business groups have engaged in deliberate denial of the science of climate change since the 1990s,[8][9][16][22][23][24][25] and some, including the National Center for Science Education, consider climate change denial to be a form of pseudoscience.[26][27][28][29]
Between 2002 and 2010, conservative billionaires secretly donated nearly $120 million (£77 million) to more than 100 organizations seeking to cast doubt on the science behind climate change.[30]
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

So you have no comments to refute the scientists who state very directrly that Cook mis-classified their papers.

All you can do is throw out more absurd character assassination and name calling.

So bottom line - everthing stated about the fabrications in Cook's paper is correct and you have nothing in your bag of tricks to show otherwise.

P.S. - You do know that Cook is a cartoonist and NOT a scientist.
http://web.archive.org/web/20071213172906/www.skepticalscience.com/page.php?p=3

"This site was created by John Cook. I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist"

Yes, I have a comment. BULLSHIT from a BULLSHIT website. I wouldn't believe anything on that site. Only idiot deniers like you accept that crap as real.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

IS GWB PART OF THE PAID DENIER PROPAGANDISTS THAT CONSERVATIVE THINK TANKS PAY TO SPREAD LIES?

So you are not denying that you are part of Skeptical Science's "crusher crew" who sole intent is to "drown out" those who do not accept their alarmist positions.

All we have to do is cross-correlate your IP address from ET postings to the IP addresses in the hacked Skeptical Science information to determine the truth.

Skeptical Science hacked, private user details publicly posted online
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Ske...vate-user-details-publicly-posted-online.html
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yes, I have a comment. BULLSHIT from a BULLSHIT website. I wouldn't believe anything on that site. Only idiot deniers like you accept that crap as real.

You are denying information directly from the Skeptical Science website stating that John Cook is a cartoonist, and not a climatologist or a scientist
 
Back
Top