Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Quote from futurecurrents:

Start here. Go slowly. Watch the videos. Then go to intermediate and advanced. Then tell me that among the top specialist climatologists it is not 97% consensus.

But you will deny it or throw up some bullshit instead of admitting the essential truth.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-basic.htm
More...

Provide the SURVEYS besides Doran that show a 97% concensus - otherwise you are just talking nonsense.

How nice - you posted more links to the website funded by Al Gore. You know - Al Gore the guy whose hedge fund is making him rich off the global warming scare.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Provide the SURVEYS besides Doran that show a 97% concensus - otherwise you are just talking nonsense.

How nice - you posted more links to the website funded by Al Gore. You know - Al Gore the guy whose hedge fund is making him rich off the global warming scare.
More...

They are in there. Sorry but you may have to read and listen and watch to get the essential truth that 97% of all climatologists agree. I know that will hurt your fucked up brain.
 
John Cook is the guy paid by Al Gore to run the skeptical science website. He is the biggest nutter there is besides Hansen..

lie your ass off on you want fc...97% of 33% is the absolute best skeptical science could do.

and he can not even reproduce those numbers after they were challenged by the peer reviewed paper I cited in the original post on this thread.



Quote from jem:

it was only 97% of the 33% who endorsed agw. .

see... this is the abstract of the cook paper... from cook himself.

you have been an ignorant troll this whole thread.. and you did not even bother to look up the debunked paper...

you have been misquoting and lying your ass off for years...
this is proof.

http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article

We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics 'global climate change' or 'global warming'. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of this study, we invited authors to rate their own papers. Compared to abstract ratings, a smaller percentage of self-rated papers expressed no position on AGW (35.5%). Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus. For both abstract ratings and authors' self-ratings, the percentage of endorsements among papers expressing a position on AGW marginally increased over time. Our analysis indicates that the number of papers rejecting the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.
More...
[/B][/QUOTE]
 
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
 
This overwhelming consensus among climate experts is confirmed by an independent study that surveys all climate scientists who have publicly signed declarations supporting or rejecting the consensus. They find between 97% to 98% of climate experts support the consensus (Anderegg 2010).
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

This overwhelming consensus among climate experts is confirmed by an independent study that surveys all climate scientists who have publicly signed declarations supporting or rejecting the consensus. They find between 97% to 98% of climate experts support the consensus (Anderegg 2010).
More...

Reading abstracts of scientific papers and magically conjuring what the author's position is on global warming is NOT A SURVEY.

Here is the Anderegg 2010 abstract - it is NOT about 'publicly signed declarations - but about publications.

"Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data..."
 
anderegg took 1200 papers to start but in the end created their 97% number based less than 80 agw authors.

so again its 97% of agw nutters who support agw.




Quote from jem:

97% claim exposed / debunked.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/...ven-by-a-new-paper-showing-major-math-errors/


“0.3% climate consensus, not 97.1%”

PRESS RELEASE – September 3rd, 2013

A major peer-reviewed paper by four senior researchers has exposed grave errors in an earlier paper in a new and unknown journal that had claimed a 97.1% scientific consensus that Man had caused at least half the 0.7 Cº global warming since 1950.

A tweet in President Obama’s name had assumed that the earlier, flawed paper, by John Cook and others, showed 97% endorsement of the notion that climate change is dangerous:

“Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” [Emphasis added]

The new paper by the leading climatologist Dr David Legates and his colleagues, published in the respected Science and Education journal, now in its 21st year of publication, reveals that Cook had not considered whether scientists and their published papers had said climate change was “dangerous”.

The consensus Cook considered was the standard definition: that Man had caused most post-1950 warming. Even on this weaker definition the true consensus among published scientific papers is now demonstrated to be not 97.1%, as Cook had claimed, but only 0.3%.

Only 41 out of the 11,944 published climate papers Cook examined explicitly stated that Man caused most of the warming since 1950. Cook himself had flagged just 64 papers as explicitly supporting that consensus, but 23 of the 64 had not in fact supported it.
More...
 
Quote from jem:

anderegg took 1200 papers to start but in the end created their 97% number based less than 80 agw authors.

so again its 97% of agw nutters who support agw.
More...

Yes, nutters. Like Exxon.

You're such an asshole.

Rising greenhouse-gas emissions pose significant risks to society and ecosystems. Since most of these emissions are energy-related, any integrated approach to meeting the world’s growing energy needs over the coming decades must incorporate strategies to address the risk of climate change.

http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/environment/climate-change
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top