Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

gwb-trading · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from futurecurrents:

Chart is wrong.

The chart is wrong? You are delusional.

You can read the entire paper and retrieve all of source data used in Beck's paper which defines the chart.

http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/

jem · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from gwb-trading:

I find it absurd that China (which has the largest CO2 emissions) is considered a "poor country" that we must transfer wealth to under this agreement.

that and the fact the whole thing is absurd. not a shred of science showing man made co2 causes significant warming.

gwb-trading · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from Lucrum:

"Chart is wrong."

As in with a little honest adjustment to the X axis it wouldn't be nearly so "scary"

Exactly... FC loves big scary charts with the x and y axis' adjusted for maximum fear generation - got to love these alarmists.

gwb-trading · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from futurecurrents:

Nice bullshit chart fhl. Means nothing and certainly not what you think it does.

The number of record temps is dependent on the previous records. Once they are set they don't easily get broken again.

But you and your denier moron friends and Republicans don't understand that.

The hottest years on record have all occurred recently.

Wrong. The Medieval Warm Period was significantly warmer than it is today.

They were FARMING in Greenland from 900AD to 1250AD including crops such as barley.

Why do you think the Vikings called it "Greenland" instead of some name like "barren desolate icy island"?

futurecurrents · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from fhl:

Bullshit crap chart not up to date.

Try again.

futurecurrents · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from fhl:

When your fellow liberals refer to warming, they are talking about it in terms of man made warming from co2. Remember?

That is not what my fellow conservatives here accept.

But thanks for chiming in once again, as you always do, to try and deceive and confuse.

Yes, Republicans are so incredibly stupid that they don't understand that raising greenhouse gasses by 40% will result in warming.

futurecurrents · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from gwb-trading:

The chart is wrong? You are delusional.

You can read the entire paper and retrieve all of source data used in Beck's paper which defines the chart.

http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/

Why does it stop at 1960?

I'll tell you why. Because it's just more denialist bullshit.

This is the real deal.

futurecurrents · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from jem:

that and the fact the whole thing is absurd. not a shred of science showing man made co2 causes significant warming.

There is a massive amount showing it. You are just too stupid and crazed to see it.

American Chemical Society

"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem."

futurecurrents · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from gwb-trading:

Wrong. The Medieval Warm Period was significantly warmer than it is today.

They were FARMING in Greenland from 900AD to 1250AD including crops such as barley.

Why do you think the Vikings called it "Greenland" instead of some name like "barren desolate icy island"?

No. You are wrong.

gwb-trading · Nov 20, 2013

Quote from futurecurrents:

Why does it stop at 1960?

I'll tell you why. Because it's just more denialist bullshit.

This is the real deal.

You realize the source of the data is from AGW supporters. This article simply referred to Beck's paper that graphed it and provide details / links to the dataset.

So in your mind, graphing data that comes from global warming supporters is considered "denialist bullshit".

Not even Mayor Ford in Toronto could smoke enough crack to make that fantasy turn into a reality.