Wow.
Just wow.
Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Wow.
Just wow.
Yeah, what ever. I guess you didn't notice that jem starts every post to me with word and troll and some other insult. Or that comments about someone's mother only followed posts saying me and my brother have gay sex. I guess your equal mindedness is not really equal is it?
If you choose to ignore all the solid authoritative science, rational analysis and explanations I have posted but instead highlight my deserved condemnation of the stupidity, intellectual dishonesty and just plain lying of jem and gwb and a few others then......you're just another ignorant - and I assume right-wing - asshole.
Maybe you need to carefully read stoic's complete collection of rude names that you have been calling others and reflect on your online behavior. Would you talk to people face-to-face like this?
You have not been posting "solid authoritative science, rational analysis and explanations" - you have been merely insulting everyone who has a different opinion than you.
I am merely returning that which thrown at me. In addition, when someone like jem, who is smart enough to know the truth, but instead knowingly peddles in lies and disinformation, I'm going to call a spade a spade. Tough shit. Reasoning and facts don't work, so what the hell. The same for you. I have suspicions you both are the same person. You are both essentially liars and you suck because of that. This is not a game. It has to do with nothing less than the survivability of the planet for future generations and the planet's ecosystems. Excuse me if that gets my attention and passion. It should you also.
And I certainly HAVE been posting solid and authoritative science and rational analysis. The fact that you don't see it, understand it, or believe it, is further proof of just how fucking dumb, deluded and blind you are.
Man made global warming is a fact and is responsible for most if all of the warming over the last fifty years. The science is both common sense and overwhelming in both scope and consensus.
Of course the real crime is that the global warming scam leads to wasteful, unneeded government policy and spending.
Man made global warming is a fact and is responsible for most if not all of the warming over the last fifty years. The science is both common sense and overwhelming in both scope and consensus.
This is what the American Physical Society says about it...
"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earthâs physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now."
This is what the American Physical Society says about it...
"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earthâs physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now."
I was surprised to see this on BP's website...
"Our view is that putting a price on carbon â one that applies economy-wide and treats all carbon equally, whether it comes out of an industrial smokestack or a car exhaust â will make energy efficiency and conservation more attractive to businesses and individuals, and help lower-carbon energy sources become more cost competitive within the energy mix. While a global price would be most economically efficient, regional and national approaches are a necessary first step, provided temporary financial relief is given to domestic industrial sectors that are trade exposed."
"Our view is that putting a price on carbon â one that applies economy-wide and treats all carbon equally, whether it comes out of an industrial smokestack or a car exhaust â will make energy efficiency and conservation more attractive to businesses and individuals, and help lower-carbon energy sources become more cost competitive within the energy mix. While a global price would be most economically efficient, regional and national approaches are a necessary first step, provided temporary financial relief is given to domestic industrial sectors that are trade exposed."
