Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
You are even stupider than I thought if you don't know why the oceans are warming and that they are absorbing CO2.
You have now established beyond any doubt that you are truly clueless and very confused about the science of AGW.
One would almost think that you have lived on steady diet of right wing propaganda and disinformation for the last ten years.
Quote from Lucrum:
I'm not too worried about it. Who wants to swim in cold water anyway?
Of course you are not worried about it. No surprise there. Ignorance is bliss.
you are such a ignorant childish troll.
you could have tried answering the question truthfully.
you are not even aware that as oceans warm they release co2?
are you that stupid?
1. http://www.newscientist.com/article...ase-co2-faster-than-thought.html#.UnUoYlCAd8E
Rising temperatures make carbon dioxide leak from the oceans for two main reasons. First, melting sea ice increases the rate that the ocean mixes, which dredges up CO2-rich deep ocean waters. Second, "when you warm the ocean up, just like warming up a Coke bottle, it drives the gas out," says van Ommen.
2. science is not sure what it causing the oceans to warm.
if it were co2 they would most likely be warming uniformly.
they are not warming uniformly. much of the warming is in the indian oceans.
some are speculating its the underwater volcanoes.
you could have tried answering the question truthfully.
you are not even aware that as oceans warm they release co2?
are you that stupid?
1. http://www.newscientist.com/article...ase-co2-faster-than-thought.html#.UnUoYlCAd8E
Rising temperatures make carbon dioxide leak from the oceans for two main reasons. First, melting sea ice increases the rate that the ocean mixes, which dredges up CO2-rich deep ocean waters. Second, "when you warm the ocean up, just like warming up a Coke bottle, it drives the gas out," says van Ommen.
2. science is not sure what it causing the oceans to warm.
if it were co2 they would most likely be warming uniformly.
they are not warming uniformly. much of the warming is in the indian oceans.
some are speculating its the underwater volcanoes.
Oh great. Just when you thought the that global warming hysteria might be dying down just a bit, some scientists are now warning about global cooling.
From the DC:
Is there a new scientific consensus forming around global cooling? Thatâs what environmentalist Lawrence Solomon writes in the Financial Post, citing the fact that solar activity is decreasing at the fastest rate as anytime in the last 10,000 years.
âNow an increasing number of scientists are swinging back to the thinking of the 1960s and 1970s,â Solomon writes. âThe global cooling hypothesis may have been right after all, they say. Earth may be entering a new Little Ice Age.â
Solomon adds that Columbia Universityâs George Kukla â who warned the U.S. government about the dangers of global cooling in 1972 â postulated that â[g]lobal warming always precedes an ice age⦠The warming we saw in the 1980s and 1990s, in other words, was expected all along, much as the calm before the storm.â
Recently, scientists have been looking to solar activity as a predictor of world climate. Low solar activity has been connected with cold periods in human history, while high levels of solar activity have been connected with warming periods, like the recent one from the 1950s to 1998.
The United Nationâs climate authority has tried to downplay the influence of solar activity on the Earthâs climate, but climate scientists have been more assertive that the sun plays a role in affecting global temperatures...
From the DC:
Is there a new scientific consensus forming around global cooling? Thatâs what environmentalist Lawrence Solomon writes in the Financial Post, citing the fact that solar activity is decreasing at the fastest rate as anytime in the last 10,000 years.
âNow an increasing number of scientists are swinging back to the thinking of the 1960s and 1970s,â Solomon writes. âThe global cooling hypothesis may have been right after all, they say. Earth may be entering a new Little Ice Age.â
Solomon adds that Columbia Universityâs George Kukla â who warned the U.S. government about the dangers of global cooling in 1972 â postulated that â[g]lobal warming always precedes an ice age⦠The warming we saw in the 1980s and 1990s, in other words, was expected all along, much as the calm before the storm.â
Recently, scientists have been looking to solar activity as a predictor of world climate. Low solar activity has been connected with cold periods in human history, while high levels of solar activity have been connected with warming periods, like the recent one from the 1950s to 1998.
The United Nationâs climate authority has tried to downplay the influence of solar activity on the Earthâs climate, but climate scientists have been more assertive that the sun plays a role in affecting global temperatures...
It's been said..."When in a debate with a liberal, when they start calling you names....you've won. It can also be said that the name calling confirms the weakness of their position.
All these quotes are from just Jan. this year in sequential order. Now just in this thread:
I left out the ones where FC truly started foaming at the mouth and used a profusion of expletives or made statements about someone's mother. Has FC ever added any value to this site? We all see the same old charts, posts with the same GW links, a plethora of the same old GW rants. And FC calls us "fanatics". As the New Year approaches I can only hope that the ET moderators send him on his way. If they do not, I propose we ALL put him on ignore.
As for you futurecurrents, I must come to the conclusion that you REALLY do suffer from Chicken Little Syndrome. Incapable of independent thought. Totally unable to review or even acknowledge any deviation to your world view. And you say we're myopic. Anytime anyone provides an alternative that maybe, ....just maybe it was an acorn that fell on your head and not the sky, you refuse to even look......accuse it as delusional, or label it as right-wing FF propaganda. Everything stated by the left is as true as the sky is blue. Everything on the right is misinformation and half truths at best. Both sides have their agenda, and both sides spew out propaganda to further that agenda. It matters not what side your on, what matters is, are you able to see propaganda for what it is. Clearly you can not. I truly pity you for that.
All these quotes are from just Jan. this year in sequential order. Now just in this thread:
I left out the ones where FC truly started foaming at the mouth and used a profusion of expletives or made statements about someone's mother. Has FC ever added any value to this site? We all see the same old charts, posts with the same GW links, a plethora of the same old GW rants. And FC calls us "fanatics". As the New Year approaches I can only hope that the ET moderators send him on his way. If they do not, I propose we ALL put him on ignore.
As for you futurecurrents, I must come to the conclusion that you REALLY do suffer from Chicken Little Syndrome. Incapable of independent thought. Totally unable to review or even acknowledge any deviation to your world view. And you say we're myopic. Anytime anyone provides an alternative that maybe, ....just maybe it was an acorn that fell on your head and not the sky, you refuse to even look......accuse it as delusional, or label it as right-wing FF propaganda. Everything stated by the left is as true as the sky is blue. Everything on the right is misinformation and half truths at best. Both sides have their agenda, and both sides spew out propaganda to further that agenda. It matters not what side your on, what matters is, are you able to see propaganda for what it is. Clearly you can not. I truly pity you for that.
This is a classic P&R post! I have always hoped that FC would see the error his ways and consider being more polite, but I have pretty much given up hope on changes for the better. He appears to be in a steep decline and the name calling is just increasing.
