Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
UN Climate Report Goes Bust: Even Media Fails to Promote: Top Scientists (including IPCC reviewers) Condemn IPCC Report as âPremeditated Murder of Scienceâ â âabsurdâ â âpoliticalâ â âwrongâ â âdogmaticâ â âpropagandaâ â âgrossest misrepresentation of dataâ*
*climatedepot.com
*climatedepot.com
ClimateDepot.com is the website of Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow employee Marc Morano, a conservative global warming denier who previously served as environmental communications director for a vocal political denier of climate change, Republican Sen. James Inhofe. Launched in spring 2009, Climate Depot claimed it would be "the Senate EPW website on steroids," and "the most comprehensive information center on climate news and the related issues of environment and energy."[1]
ClimateDepot.com is being financed by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, a nonprofit in Washington that advocates for free-market solutions to environmental issues. Public tax filings for 2003-7 (the last five years for which documents are available) show that the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the ExxonMobil Foundation and foundations associated with the billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, a longtime financier of conservative causes, including being the primary source of money used to fund attacks against Bill Clinton during the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky eras of his presidency [1]. According to a report issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists, from 1998-2005, approximately 23% of the total ExxonMobil funding for the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow was directed by ExxonMobil for climate change activities [p. 32].
On December 4, 2012, Morano debated Bill Nye the Science Guy on the topic of global warming on CNN's Piers Morgan Tonight.[9] At the end of 2012, Media Matters for America named Morano the "Climate Change Misinformer of the Year."[10]
In other words. It's not a site for the real science.
ClimateDepot.com is being financed by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, a nonprofit in Washington that advocates for free-market solutions to environmental issues. Public tax filings for 2003-7 (the last five years for which documents are available) show that the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the ExxonMobil Foundation and foundations associated with the billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, a longtime financier of conservative causes, including being the primary source of money used to fund attacks against Bill Clinton during the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky eras of his presidency [1]. According to a report issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists, from 1998-2005, approximately 23% of the total ExxonMobil funding for the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow was directed by ExxonMobil for climate change activities [p. 32].
On December 4, 2012, Morano debated Bill Nye the Science Guy on the topic of global warming on CNN's Piers Morgan Tonight.[9] At the end of 2012, Media Matters for America named Morano the "Climate Change Misinformer of the Year."[10]
In other words. It's not a site for the real science.
Maybe you need to read the article. It entirely consists of links to the statements from leading respected scientists trashing the IPCC report.
You can spend hours belittling the ClimateDepot website - it does not change the statements from all the leading scientists that AGW is a farce.
Al Gore funds your favorite website (Skeptical Science) promoting AGW fabrications to drive profits into his pocket via his hedge fund.
you troll...
read the recent science. The NASA scientist used the term thermostat correctly... the way scientists now understand the science.
greenhouse gases along with other natural mechanisms moderate"forcings". co2 rejects warming energy in the upper atmosphere but keeps warming in... according to the current science.
but co2 only plays a small role in the thermostatic action of greenhouse gases. Water vapor clouds and aerosols are currently thought to play a much larger role than co2.
read the recent science. The NASA scientist used the term thermostat correctly... the way scientists now understand the science.
greenhouse gases along with other natural mechanisms moderate"forcings". co2 rejects warming energy in the upper atmosphere but keeps warming in... according to the current science.
but co2 only plays a small role in the thermostatic action of greenhouse gases. Water vapor clouds and aerosols are currently thought to play a much larger role than co2.
Something for FC...
