Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Here is also a large part of the greenhouse..
again science does not know if adding more warms or cools...


http://climatekids.nasa.gov/nasa-research/


Aerosols are tiny particles or droplets of liquid floating in the air. Earth has lots of them. Some are natural. They might come from volcanoes, forest fires, vegetation, or sea spray. However, about 10% of the aerosols in our atmosphere come from human activity—for example, when we burn gas in our cars and coal in our power plants.

Scientists do not understand how aerosols affect regional and global climate. They are not even sure whether aerosols are warming or cooling our planet.

Instruments on these satellites are collecting information on aerosols:
 
Here is the sun... guess what NASA needs to study the sun as well.

http://climatekids.nasa.gov/nasa-research/


Do the Sun's natural cycles affect our climate?

Cartoon of Sun with sunspots.
We know that our Sun has an 11-year cycle. It is quiet for a while, then it gradually gets more active, up to its "solar maximum." Then it settles down again. Even so, its energy output varies only a tiny fraction (8/10,000ths or .08%) from lowest to highest output. We also think the Sun's energy output may vary over longer periods too. Scientists aren't sure about any longer-term cycles, though. That's because they have been closely monitoring the Sun for only about 40 years.

Two NASA Earth satellites that are studying the Sun are:
 
Quote from jem:

you lying ass.

just a few pages back I gave you quotes from NASA where they explained they do not know the net effect that the largest greenhouse gases have on the earth.

They said they doing tests on whether more water vapor results in cooling or warming.

Same with aerosols.

CO2 is only a tiny fraction of the greenhouse and science does not know what adding more really does.

If they did your IPCC models would not have failed.
If they did Ricter would be posting links when he makes his proclamations which are pure bullshit.
here is my science. Posted in the next two posts

Piece of shit liar.
 
Quote from jem:

Here is the largest greenhouse gas.
Science does not know if adding more warms or cools.

http://climatekids.nasa.gov/nasa-research/

Water in the atmosphere also acts as a greenhouse gas. The atmosphere contains a lot of water. This water can be in the form of a gas—water vapor—or in the form of a liquid—clouds. Clouds are water vapor that has cooled and condensed back into tiny droplets of liquid water.

Clouds as seen from space.
Earth's clouds as seen from space.

Water in the clouds holds in some of the heat from Earth's surface. But the bright white tops of clouds also reflect some of the sunlight back to space. So with clouds, some energy from the Sun never even reaches Earth's surface.

How much the clouds affect the warming or cooling of Earth's surface is one of those tricky questions that several NASA missions are aiming to answer.

You are a piece of shit lying scumbag lawyer.
 
Quote from jem:

Here is the sun... guess what NASA needs to study the sun as well.

http://climatekids.nasa.gov/nasa-research/


Do the Sun's natural cycles affect our climate?

Cartoon of Sun with sunspots.
We know that our Sun has an 11-year cycle. It is quiet for a while, then it gradually gets more active, up to its "solar maximum." Then it settles down again. Even so, its energy output varies only a tiny fraction (8/10,000ths or .08%) from lowest to highest output. We also think the Sun's energy output may vary over longer periods too. Scientists aren't sure about any longer-term cycles, though. That's because they have been closely monitoring the Sun for only about 40 years.

Two NASA Earth satellites that are studying the Sun are:

Go fuck yourself.
 
AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2
AAAS emblem
American Association for the Advancement of Science
"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3
ACS emblem
American Chemical Society
"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4
AGU emblem
American Geophysical Union
"The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system — including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, the sea level, the distribution of precipitation, and the length of seasons — are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007)5
AMA emblem
American Medical Association
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6
AMS emblem
American Meteorological Society
"It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7
APS emblem
American Physical Society
"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8
GSA emblem
The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9


SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International academies: Joint statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10
USNAS emblem
U.S. National Academy of Sciences
"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)11


U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
USGCRP emblem
U.S. Global Change Research Program
"The global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to human-induced increases in heat-trapping gases. Human 'fingerprints' also have been identified in many other aspects of the climate system, including changes in ocean heat content, precipitation, atmospheric moisture, and Arctic sea ice." (2009, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12


INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES
IPCC emblem
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.”13

“Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely* due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”14

*IPCC defines ‘very likely’ as greater than 90 percent probability of occurrence.


OTHER RESOURCES
List of worldwide scientific organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
http://opr.ca.gov/s_listoforganizations.php
 
In summary... when science speak the truth about greenhouse gases... there answer is that they do not know if adding more will warm or cool.

Science understands CO2 is a thermostat. So by definition it can warm or cool.

We realize that the earth is a very complex and dynamic system.
Only lying govt workers and idiot leftist drones pretend they know what the next particle or next years worth of co2 particles will do. We simply do not know.

here is science showing co2 cools...

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/


“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.
“The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
 
Quote from jem:

In summary... when science speak the truth about greenhouse gases... there answer is that they do not know if adding more will warm or cool.

Science understands CO2 is a thermostat. So by definition it can warm or cool.

We realize that the earth is a very complex and dynamic system.
Only lying govt workers and idiot leftist drones pretend they know what the next particle or next years worth of co2 particles will do. We simply do not know.

here is science showing co2 cools...

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/


“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.
“The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.

Stick a pick in your eye and push hard. You suck.
 
hey asshole I am quoting science...

its the science you detest.

Quote from futurecurrents:

jem, you are a detestable lying, sick man. Hope you die soon.
 
Back
Top