Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:

Only numb nut trolls go around correcting scientists without linking or citing to any work or science.

Its not whether CO2 it actually is a thermostat... or even whether or not it acts as a negative feedback system...
it is that co2 acts like a thermostat...

"A thermostat is a component of a control system which senses the temperature of a system so that the system's temperature is maintained near a desired setpoint. The thermostat does this by switching heating or cooling devices on or off, or regulating the flow of a heat transfer fluid as needed, to maintain the correct temperature. The name is derived from the Greek words thermos "hot" and statos "a standing"."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermostat

regarding the consensus of probability... who cares... I suspect we could be warming the earth too...

the question is show us the science that says man made co2 is doing the warming.

Only an idiot would post a proof of my statement and claim it proves theirs instead. By the definition of thermostat above it is clear that CO2 does NOT work like a thermostat. You are incredibly stupid to still not understand the difference between a blanket and thermostat or to think the thermosphere is even relevant.

Of course, you are an intellectual fraud so it doesn't matter to you. You're just blindly swinging away hoping something hits. It's pathetic.



Here is the science that says man made CO2 is doing the warming....


CO2 is a greenhouse gas. There is no question about it.

Man has increased levels by 40%. There is no question about it.

These guys know something about it...

American Physical Society

"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:

not exactly..

NASA is saying CO2 can have thermostatic properties...
.

You are a liar. NASA DOES NOT SAY ANY SUCH THING.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from jem:

show us the science... seriously... show us the science that says man made co2 causes warming here on earth?

not opinion but science which supports scientific conclusions.

I have been asking you and separately the leftist trolls for the science for years.

Its my opinion that all these humans impacting the earth in so many ways is bound to be doing something and that something might include warming.

But, that is not science.

Jem, a summary of the science to date is on NASA's front page. The science has arrived at a probability that Man is presently warming the planet. Maybe it's actually the remaining uncertainty that you think is unscientific... ?

 

[futurecurrents]

Here is some of the science proving CO2 causes global warming.


http://www.skepticalscience.com/emp...2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect-intermediate.htm

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from Ricter:

"NASA did not put any science behind their prediction of warming.."

Nonsense.

I can't believe he actually said that.

What a fool.

 

[jem]

We have gone over this before... there is no science on that page showing man made co2 results in net warming or that even more co2 results in net warming. That is why I keep telling you that you need to think in systems. Apparently you cannot.

1. the first part of your article just says that co2 is a greenhouse gas that can keep warming in.

we have also just seen that nasa says that greenhouse gases also keep warming out. NASA also says they are not sure what effect more greenhouse gases have but they are willing to speculate. So your link does not show whether adding man made CO2 creates warming or cooling.


2. it just some "scientists" using models to infer the contribution of greenhouse gases to warming...

hence the title...

Anthropogenic and natural warming inferred from changes in Earth’s energy balance.

Quote from futurecurrents:

Here is some of the science proving CO2 causes global warming.


http://www.skepticalscience.com/emp...2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect-intermediate.htm

 

[jem]

I clicked on evidence... what I saw was some evidence of warming...
but nothing that proved man was responsible for net warming..

certainly nothing which showed man made co2 was causing warming.

(remember we just showed on this thread that NASA says we really do not know what a change in the greenhouse will do.)


http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.2Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. Increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.
Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in solar output, in the Earth’s orbit, and in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.3
Scientific Consensus
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position.

Click here for a partial list of these public statements and related resources.

Quote from Ricter:

Jem, a summary of the science to date is on NASA's front page. The science has arrived at a probability that Man is presently warming the planet. Maybe it's actually the remaining uncertainty that you think is unscientific... ?

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:

We have gone over this before... there is no science on that page showing man made co2 results in net warming or that even more co2 results in net warming.

You're lying. Yes there is.

Willful stupidity is no substitute for understanding

American Chemical Society statement on AGW...

"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem."

 

[jem]

I am tired of you being and ignorant lying agw nutter and then pretending your are not the asshole here.

where on the page is the science showing man made co2 causes net warming on earth.

where you lying dipshit... where ...

just give us a quote... showing man made co2 causes net warming on earth.

Quote from futurecurrents:

You're lying. Yes there is.

Willful stupidity is no substitute for understanding

American Chemical Society statement on AGW...

"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem."

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:

I am tired of you being and ignorant lying agw nutter and then pretending your are not the asshole here.

where on the page is the science showing man made co2 causes net warming on earth.

where you lying dipshit... where ...

just give us a quote... showing man made co2 causes net warming on earth.

You're lying and willfully stupid. The worst kind of stupidity. It's right on those pages. You may have to read more than one page and use some thinking in systems. You apparently can't think in systems or anything more complex than 2+2. I'm embarrassed for you.


http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect-advanced.htm


American Meteorological Society
"It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7