Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Quote from gwb-trading:

The chart I posted is the actual reading vs. the models. You can dig in to the IPCC reports and find it.

The chart you posted does not include all the models and is totally incorrect. Please post a chart showing the results of ALL the models (Oh wait, I did - the one from the IPCC.

Maybe you need stop calling intelligent people stupid, start reading the actual data, and open your mind to the truth.
More...

What part of "your chart only includes a very particular subset of temp readings...those of mid altitude. mid-latitude, from balloons" do you not understand. Those readings do NOT represent the earth as whole. I will stop calling you stupid when you stop ignoring this simple fact.

The chart I posted certainly does include all the relevant models. See all the different lines? They are all the models. The chart is certainly correct.

But you're right. I should stop calling you stupid. Idiotic is more like it.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Physics in a two quart closed glass container on your desk does not work the same way as the entire earth.
More...

No shit Sherlock.


But it does give proof of the properties of CO2. Whether it's in a jar or the atmosphere, those properties are still there.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

What part of "your chart only includes a very particular subset of temp readings...those of mid altitude. mid-latitude, from balloons" do you not understand. Those readings do NOT represent the earth as whole. I will stop calling you stupid when you stop ignoring this simple fact.

The chart I posted certainly does include all the relevant models. See all the different lines? They are all the models. The chart is certainly correct.

But you're right. I should stop calling you stupid. Idiotic is more like it.
More...

Where is your chart with ALL 73 IPCC models?
 
you mean the thermostat like properties nasa speaks of...
correct?


http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”

Quote from futurecurrents:

No shit Sherlock.


But it does give proof of the properties of CO2. Whether it's in a jar or the atmosphere, those properties are still there.
More...
 
The Obama administration never has been serious about curbing illegal immigration, and this story demonstrates that point. Rather than spend the taxpayer’s money on something required by the Constitution, the Obama administration is dumping billions of dollars into the junk-science of Global Warming.

from DC:

New estimates show the federal government will spend nearly twice as much fighting global warming this year than on U.S. border security.

The White House reported to House Republicans that there are 18 federal agencies engaged in global warming activities in 2013, funding a wide range of programs, including scientific research, international climate assistance, incentivizing renewable energy technology and subsidies to renewable energy producers. Global warming spending is estimated to cost $22.2 billion this year, and $21.4 billion next year.

At the same time, the federal government will spend nearly $12 billion on customs and border enforcement this year.
 
Quote from jem:

you mean the thermostat like properties nasa speaks of...
correct?


http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
More...

Amazing. You still pretend to not know what a thermostat is. You still pretend to think the thermosphere is relevant.

You are intellectually dishonest. That's worse than being stupid.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

The Obama administration never has been serious about curbing illegal immigration, and this story demonstrates that point. Rather than spend the taxpayer’s money on something required by the Constitution, the Obama administration is dumping billions of dollars into the junk-science of Global Warming.

from DC:

New estimates show the federal government will spend nearly twice as much fighting global warming this year than on U.S. border security.

The White House reported to House Republicans that there are 18 federal agencies engaged in global warming activities in 2013, funding a wide range of programs, including scientific research, international climate assistance, incentivizing renewable energy technology and subsidies to renewable energy producers. Global warming spending is estimated to cost $22.2 billion this year, and $21.4 billion next year.

At the same time, the federal government will spend nearly $12 billion on customs and border enforcement this year.
More...


Only an ignorant deluded righty would refer to the science of AGW as "junk " science or think border security is more important than catastrophic worldwide climate change and the acidification of the planets oceans, destruction of ecosystems and associated human casualties.


Hey, we have keep out the Mexicans before we try to save the world....... is what they say.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Only an ignorant deluded righty would refer to the science of AGW as "junk " science or think border security is more important than catastrophic worldwide climate change and the acidification of the planets oceans, destruction of ecosystems and associated human casualties....
More...
So you're saying there is one positive thing about AGW, fewer Mexican illegal immigrants?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Only an ignorant deluded righty would refer to the science of AGW as "junk " science or think border security is more important than catastrophic worldwide climate change and the acidification of the planets oceans, destruction of ecosystems and associated human casualties.


Hey, we have keep out the Mexicans before we try to save the world....... is what they say.
More...

I think you are off your rocker...

A strong military defense and proper border security is the first and primary purpose of the federal government under the constitution.

Blowing money to solve a problem like "global warming" that does not exist is height of deluded intellect.

I'm just waiting for 2040 where we can hear you chant the mantra of how "global cooling" is going to kill all of us. At which point we will gleefully recycle your "global warming" posts from 30 years prior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top