Ah... this is why FC was Troll of the Year. Here he is once again urging people to harm themselves.
P.S. - You shouldn't really be proud of the award. It is normally given to the clinically insane.
Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Ah... this is why FC was Troll of the Year. Here he is once again urging people to harm themselves.
P.S. - You shouldn't really be proud of the award. It is normally given to the clinically insane.
more CO2 and Zero warming - statistically speaking - means your models failed.
the IPCC vice chair said so.
agw nutter scientists hans van storch admitted only 2 percent of his runs came out with no warming... which means in the world of modeling the models failed.
from the respected MIT professor...
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/95-of-climate-models-agree-the-observations-must-be-wrong/
95% of Climate Models Agree: The Observations Must be Wrong
February 7th, 2014 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
Iâm seeing a lot of wrangling over the recent (15+ year) pause in global average warmingâ¦when did it start, is it a full pause, shouldnât we be taking the longer view, etc.
These are all interesting exercises, but they miss the most important point: the climate models that governments base policy decisions on have failed miserably.
Iâve updated our comparison of 90 climate models versus observations for global average surface temperatures through 2013, and we still see that >95% of the models have over-forecast the warming trend since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH):
CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013
Whether humans are the cause of 100% of the observed warming or not, the conclusion is that global warming isnât as bad as was predicted. That should have major policy implicationsâ¦assuming policy is still informed by facts more than emotions and political aspirations.
And if humans are the cause of only, say, 50% of the warming (e.g. our published paper), then there is even less reason to force expensive and prosperity-destroying energy policies down our throats.
I am growing weary of the variety of emotional, misleading, and policy-useless statements like âmost warming since the 1950s is human causedâ or â97% of climate scientists agree humans are contributing to warmingâ, neither of which leads to the conclusion we need to substantially increase energy prices and freeze and starve more poor people to death for the greater good.
Yet, that is the direction we are heading.
And even if the extra energy is being stored in the deep ocean (if you have faith in long-term measured warming trends of thousandths or hundredths of a degree), I say âgreat!â. Because that extra heat is in the form of a tiny temperature change spread throughout an unimaginably large heat sink, which can never have an appreciable effect on future surface climate.
If the deep ocean ends up averaging 4.1 deg. C, rather than 4.0 deg. C, it wonât really matter.
the IPCC vice chair said so.
agw nutter scientists hans van storch admitted only 2 percent of his runs came out with no warming... which means in the world of modeling the models failed.
from the respected MIT professor...
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/95-of-climate-models-agree-the-observations-must-be-wrong/
95% of Climate Models Agree: The Observations Must be Wrong
February 7th, 2014 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
Iâm seeing a lot of wrangling over the recent (15+ year) pause in global average warmingâ¦when did it start, is it a full pause, shouldnât we be taking the longer view, etc.
These are all interesting exercises, but they miss the most important point: the climate models that governments base policy decisions on have failed miserably.
Iâve updated our comparison of 90 climate models versus observations for global average surface temperatures through 2013, and we still see that >95% of the models have over-forecast the warming trend since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH):
CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013
Whether humans are the cause of 100% of the observed warming or not, the conclusion is that global warming isnât as bad as was predicted. That should have major policy implicationsâ¦assuming policy is still informed by facts more than emotions and political aspirations.
And if humans are the cause of only, say, 50% of the warming (e.g. our published paper), then there is even less reason to force expensive and prosperity-destroying energy policies down our throats.
I am growing weary of the variety of emotional, misleading, and policy-useless statements like âmost warming since the 1950s is human causedâ or â97% of climate scientists agree humans are contributing to warmingâ, neither of which leads to the conclusion we need to substantially increase energy prices and freeze and starve more poor people to death for the greater good.
Yet, that is the direction we are heading.
And even if the extra energy is being stored in the deep ocean (if you have faith in long-term measured warming trends of thousandths or hundredths of a degree), I say âgreat!â. Because that extra heat is in the form of a tiny temperature change spread throughout an unimaginably large heat sink, which can never have an appreciable effect on future surface climate.
If the deep ocean ends up averaging 4.1 deg. C, rather than 4.0 deg. C, it wonât really matter.
[/QUOTE]
Dr Roy Spencer is an idiot and a fool and has no respect from the climate community.... 97% of whom are in consensus.
So of course you quote the asshole and not the 97%.
Fact is....one cannot say the models failed. The earth has not even slowed it's warming. And CO2 is STILL a greenhouse gas.
Why you have to refer to propagandists and disinformers all the time is a real mystery. It could be because you are a lying rightwing douchebag to stubborn and ideologically deranged to admit the truth.
So of course you quote the asshole and not the 97%.
Fact is....one cannot say the models failed. The earth has not even slowed it's warming. And CO2 is STILL a greenhouse gas.
Why you have to refer to propagandists and disinformers all the time is a real mystery. It could be because you are a lying rightwing douchebag to stubborn and ideologically deranged to admit the truth.
You must be looking in the mirror because you keep making the same mistake.
You leftist big govt fascist jerkoffs are jeopardizing the lives of our children with your ridiculous spending and leftist lies.
I even respond to this fraudcurrents propaganda because I sense we are at a tipping point... and I think there is still a chance to preserve a future for our children.
Luckily we see the tide turning against your leftist crap. Now we have to get the polticians to respect our wishes.
and as far as my not having children... you do not know what the hell you are talking about on that point either.
You leftist big govt fascist jerkoffs are jeopardizing the lives of our children with your ridiculous spending and leftist lies.
I even respond to this fraudcurrents propaganda because I sense we are at a tipping point... and I think there is still a chance to preserve a future for our children.
Luckily we see the tide turning against your leftist crap. Now we have to get the polticians to respect our wishes.
and as far as my not having children... you do not know what the hell you are talking about on that point either.
if you look at the chart you will see the data set which show the earth has not been warming as predicted by the models. The earth has no warmed outsides of the margin for statistical error for over 17 years.
The IPCC vice chair just told you that... you troll.
The IPCC vice chair just told you that... you troll.
What a coincidence. You're also an idiot that has no respect from the ET community...97% of whom are in consensus.
Boo fucking hoo. Is global warming somehow fucking with your retirement income, old man? I am sure mommy is leaving youe something. Ridiculous spending?
Stop manufacturing the notion that you have a wife and kids. Pabst told me you were single, so stop the charade unless you bot a mail order groom complete with kids. Of course you don't give a shit. You're one more nervous breakdown from the clock tower. Isn't it time to watch American Idol with your mommy?
I wonder if jerm has the balls to write his thoughts about the "Hoax of GW" in the family bible. This way his grandchildren and great grandchildren can see what an asshole he was.
Thank your God that ship has sailed. He is a 50-something "bachelor" wink wink.