Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
And the recent 17 year pause? Consolidation or temp trend change?
If the Y axis on your chart started at zero, it wouldn't look so "scary".
And the recent 17 year pause? Consolidation or temp trend change?
If the Y axis on your chart started at zero, it wouldn't look so "scary".
lol unch for 17 years at 400ppm out of 400,000 years? (arguably 650k years, but going by the chart). It's moved more in 60Y than it's moved in any 30,000 year period in history and more in the last 10,000Y than at any time, ever. Looks like a dramatic new high to me. You can't be serious.
You think maybe it's all those damn volcanoes erupting all over the globe?
Replacing 160ppm with zero would help how? The Y-axis is linear (as is X).
I am serious. And 400 ppm is only 0.04% of the atmosphere.
I read only last year that a single volcanic eruption ( don't recall which one) completely negated the EU's entire carbon reduction effort to date.
It won't change the numbers, it will make it look less dramatic.
But then if you want it to look dramatic...
How exactly would it appear "less dramatic" to you considering it's not even a log-scale? It's linear, genius.
when you see 3 or 4 bozos cheering each on so closely together and only one of those handles was really participating in the discussion up until that poing... you are seeing sock puppets.
so we have a bunch of sock puppets cheering on their disinformation campaign which has now moved on to the leftist insult strategy.
If only one of the drone idiots could produce science showing man made co2 causes warming.
so we have a bunch of sock puppets cheering on their disinformation campaign which has now moved on to the leftist insult strategy.
If only one of the drone idiots could produce science showing man made co2 causes warming.
Are you serious?
Yes I realize it's a linear scale, genius.
Uh, no. I really don't think you do.
The scale being linear.... make the Y-axis whatever you like, nothing changes. WTF is wrong with you? Do you know which is X, Y? lol why don't you propose something other than the actual ppm-data on the Y-axis. You could simply move the decimal over if it makes it less dramatic and use pp-mille. Why your God make you stupid?
I just clicked on the link. This is a very good deconstruction of the agw nutter bullshit.
This is reality you bozo leftist drones.
http://www.friendsofscience.org/asse...ensus_Myth.pdf
"Only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117 agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950."
This is reality you bozo leftist drones.
http://www.friendsofscience.org/asse...ensus_Myth.pdf
"Only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117 agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950."