Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Quote from gwb-trading:

So once again you are posting the same old fabricated chart over and over again. You don't have anything new to contribute, eh? I guess the your part in the organizated effort to "drown out" people posting factual and relevant information simply involves posting the same old tired nonsense continually.

So answer the question - Are you part of Skeptical Science's "crusher crew" whose sole intent is to "drown out" those who do not accept their alarmist positions? Simple one word answer - Yes or No.
More...

The chart is factual. Look at it. Try to understand it. I know it's impossible for you, but try.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

The chart is factual. Look at it. Try to understand it. I know it's impossible for you, but try.
More...

Try answering the question. A simple "Yes" or "No" will do.

Let's try it again... Are you part of Skeptical Science's "crusher crew" whose sole intent is to "drown out" those who do not accept their alarmist positions? Simple one word answer - Yes or No.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Try answering the question. A simple "Yes" or "No" will do.

Let's try it again... Are you part of Skeptical Science's "crusher crew" whose sole intent is to "drown out" those who do not accept their alarmist positions? Simple one word answer - Yes or No.
More...

Please answer the question. Do you look as idiotic as you sound? Yes or no.
 
the chart shows that co2 lags the change in temperature.

salbys study shows that change in ocean temps leads change in co2 level.

which is consistent with the idea the ocean determines the co2 level.




Quote from futurecurrents:

The chart is factual. Look at it. Try to understand it. I know it's impossible for you, but try.
More...
 
How many time do I have to tell you dipshits. CO2 can both lead and lag temperature. What are you fucking stupid or something? Why don't you understand this? Republican?
 
you can keep lying without and support but the data shows co2 lags temps.

why don't you back you bullshit up with some science.

even your buddies at skeptical science don't attempt that baloney.
they claim co2 amplfies warming after temps change.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm

and I just showed you salby uses the temperature record and shows co2 lags change in ocean temps... just about perfectly.





Quote from futurecurrents:

How many time do I have to tell you dipshits. CO2 can both lead and lag temperature. What are you fucking stupid or something? Why don't you understand this? Republican?
More...
 
Quote from jem:

you can keep lying without and support but the data shows co2 lags temps.

why don't you back you bullshit up with some science.

even your buddies at skeptical science don't attempt that baloney.
they claim co2 amplfies warming after temps change.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm

and I just showed you salby uses the temperature record and shows co2 lags change in ocean temps... just about perfectly.
More...


So, let's get one thing straight, Salby, like you, is an asshole. So of course you quote him.


And second, rising CO2 levels lead temps higher. Do you know why? Because CO2 is a greenhouse gas, you idiot. You DO know what a greenhouse gas is right?

Of course you don't. You are a particularly fucked up Republican.
 
If CO2 did not cause temps to rise, the earth would not have these large swings in temps.


Because of the current CO2 levels, we are headed toward an 18 degree temperature increase. That's gonna suck. Like you.

co2-temperature.JPG


And don't forget, dickhead, CO2 levels act like the setting on a thermostat. You said that yourself.
 
2013 Hurricane Season Summary
2 Hurricanes - Neither above Category 1.
13 Named Storms

Fewest hurricanes since 1982.
Weakest season since 1950.

Alarmists: "Global Warming is causing increasing and more severe storms that are going to devastate mankind".

Mother Nature: "Bullshit. I'm the boss".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top