not only is that a picayune comment because you know they were pretty much destroyed in IRAQ by our military as bush was leaving office... you are wrong technically too...
they were not ISIS until 2013. so obama's and hillary's policies did birth them.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/12/middleeast/here-is-how-isis-began/index.html
It took territory, and a new name: ISIS
After ISI's forces gained strength in Syria, it re-entered Iraq in 2013 "as a reinvigorated force ... seizing much of Anbar a year later," CNN national security analyst Peter Bergen wrote earlier this year.
That year, Baghdadi announced the group would be known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). He also said he was merging his force with the al Qaeda-affiliated group Al-Nusra Front -- which didn't exactly agree.
they were not ISIS until 2013. so obama's and hillary's policies did birth them.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/12/middleeast/here-is-how-isis-began/index.html
It took territory, and a new name: ISIS
After ISI's forces gained strength in Syria, it re-entered Iraq in 2013 "as a reinvigorated force ... seizing much of Anbar a year later," CNN national security analyst Peter Bergen wrote earlier this year.
That year, Baghdadi announced the group would be known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). He also said he was merging his force with the al Qaeda-affiliated group Al-Nusra Front -- which didn't exactly agree.
Isis was birthed in 1999 and started fighting as part of the insurgency against Bushes invasion in 2003.The first time they called themselves the Islamic State was in 2006 before Obama and Hillary were in office.