I wanted to report out on the final results of the series of Oct VIX option trades I put on over the last few days. I legged into a series of flies up and down the vol line from 13 to 35 for low or no cost, taking profits on one to lock in breakeven on the trade series and "letting the rest ride" until today's expiration. Today's SOQ was 17.21, so my remaining five flies finished OTM. Overall p/l was approximately a scratch after commissions. I would definitely do the trade again as the r/r was excellent, with minimal risk at any point and the potential for substantial profit if VIX had settled significantly above, or below, where it did.
One key takeaway for me though is to chew on the thought process that led to my a priori assumption that, at expiration, the VIX would either be significantly elevated (if there was no budget deal yet) or collapsed (if there was a deal). As it happened, there is no signed deal yet but the VIX has priced in that there will be one so the binary settlement outcome did not occur. I saw on another thread a poster (Mav) suggesting game theory as a way of explaining an outcome such as this one, which I agree with and thought was an insightful point. Like a chess player, I need to start thinking more moves ahead when planning my trades and going beyond the simple, obvious projections of how a trade may play out.