Nope, he wasn't born in Hawaii

[Ricter]

Quote from jem:

Obama won't even be on the ballot in some states... not without producing some form of proof state registrars find acceptable.

It's fairly obvious that some registrars would not find any form of evidence acceptable. Let's face it, ANYTHING can be faked, if there is enough evil power behind doing so.

 

[Hombre]

Quote from ..........:

I'm not saying this guy looks like a racist skinhead or anything but his picture is interesting

Considering he was probably illegally looking into peoples personal info a mug shot might be next

To me he looks more like a cancer patient. But i am not a racist like yourself.
I am also not dumb and know that one cannot illegally look into public records like property ownership, birth registry etc.

 

[Hombre]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

I doubt Obama is counting on either your vote or your satisfaction...or your lowered eyebrow.

I agree with you, it was always about money for him and he will make plenty after this term is over and he will be reaping bribes just like Clinton is doing. Obamas chicks will be better looking than Clintons though.

 

[jem]

Quote from Ricter:

It's fairly obvious that some registrars would not find any form of evidence acceptable. Let's face it, ANYTHING can be faked, if there is enough evil power behind doing so.

Yes - agreed.

That is why if Obama has any non fraudulent evidence of a U.S birth, the case will likely be appealed up to the Supreme court. (and it will probably get there quickly)

 

[Ricter]

Quote from jem:

Yes - agreed.

That is why if Obama has any non fraudulent evidence of a U.S birth, the case will likely be appealed up to the Supreme court. (and it will probably get there quickly)

My point is there is no such thing as "non fraudulent" for some people. And if the Supreme Court has the "wrong" people on it, then they're no good for a final determination either.

 

[Ivanovich]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Obama won't need as many votes.

Obama will likely be the dem nominee, some middle of the road republican, and a third party wacko teasagger candidate.

How many votes did Clinton need in 1992?

So you think comparing Obama to Clinton is in the realm of realism, do you?

 

[jem]

Quote from Ricter:

My point is there is no such thing as "non fraudulent" for some people. And if the Supreme Court has the "wrong" people on it, then they're no good for a final determination either.

Determining the nature of evidence is what courts do.

There are entire sections of the Federal Rules devoted to such endeavors.

Without looking it up...

One - piece of evidence which works --

I know this is a novel idea... but how about an original.

 

[Hombre]

Quote from Ivanovich:

So you think comparing Obama to Clinton is in the realm of realism, do you?

same morals, if it ain't criminal, it is ethical .

 

[unretired]

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WMF51vXblFI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WMF51vXblFI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[OPTIONAL777]

Votes are votes...if the klannish vote for a third party teagagger candidate that helps Obama...

Quote from Ivanovich:

So you think comparing Obama to Clinton is in the realm of realism, do you?