Non-regular bars ?

Thanks ProfLogic

:-)

Quote from ProfLogic:

I spent over a year testing chart increments and the best (visually appealing or clear) were those that were least common multiples . . . prime.
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

Post one of your five minute charts from today or tomorrow from Crude, Russell, Euro FX, Nat Gas, the S&P or any of the grains and I will post a volume bar comparison of the same area. Not til tomorrow though. It's bed time.

I'll be tied up helping out my mom for the next several days, my dad is having surgery bright and early tomorrow. But I'll bump this thread or shoot you a pm when I have a minute to trade again and discuss this (next Tues hopefully). Im very interested in where this could go.
 
Thanks for all of the replies. I think the main message was don't look too short term. I had a play with Renko and Heiken Ashi bars which seem to offer a much clearer view of trends than traditional candles, but I don't like the idea of parameters in renko which could easily be wrong and provide a misleading view.

I didn't really understand the comments about prime numbers, could somebody explain simply what you are doing with the number 7 ?

Thinking about all of this a little deeper, it seems key to understand why technical analysis works in the first place, e.g. :-

1. It works by giving you a clear view of market direction which you can use. In this case finding alternative 'views' that give you an edge might be useful.

2. It works because large market players are looking at the same charts as you and making similar decision so you are riding on the back of their volume. In which case you want as standard a view as possible to get the same view (opposite to 1.)

3. It has very little merit, and any profitability is more likely due to well timed exits rather than a predictive entry.
 
Quote from Swarm:

T

Thinking about all of this a little deeper, it seems key to understand why technical analysis works in the first place, e.g. :-

1. It works by giving you a clear view of market direction which you can use. In this case finding alternative 'views' that give you an edge might be useful.

2. It works because large market players are looking at the same charts as you and making similar decision so you are riding on the back of their volume. In which case you want as standard a view as possible to get the same view (opposite to 1.)

3. It has very little merit, and any profitability is more likely due to well timed exits rather than a predictive entry.

4. It works because "Smart Money" (big traders) leaves "tracks in the snow"...it is impossible to conceal movements with volume, which are what moves price... they must show up on a chart one way or another.
Once you can see the tracks, you can figure out a way to take part in what is happening.
 
Quote from Vienna:





-For example: ...........

One more: the volume "dry-up" that occurs before big moves. The only way I have found to see that with CVB's is that the printing of bars comes almost to a standstill... but it is much harder to see because you have no way to compare it.
 
Quote from jack hershey:
----Your plight......(yada, yada, yada)......
----In my opinion, the first two comments of Nazzdack are erroneous.
----3. is the beginning of....(yada, yada, yada).......
Thanks for curing me of insomnia. :cool:
 
Quote from Swarm:

It seems to me that creating bars on arbitrary time periods like 1min, 5min, 1 hour etc. is missing most of the action...
If you have chosen your time frame(s) arbitrarily, then they are indeed arbitrary.
 
Back
Top