Nobel Winner's Comments about Blacks

[Stealth Trader]

Quote from man:

i am afraid of nazis hiding behind the shield fo free speech, which
they abolish in the nanosecond they have the power to do so.
i am afraid of half retarded, sexually disoriented men that dream
of the white race as the one and only real human being.
i am afraid of their stupidity and of the slicky pseudo-factual style
they hide their actual opinion behind. like YOU do.

say your opinion. say it loud and clear. for yourself. say that the
white race is superior to all others, especially to the blacks. say it.

I could be playing devils advocate here, but you ASSume differently for no other reason than what may or may not be implied goes against the political brainwashing you are so accustomed to. No surprise there. As such, like the puppet you show yourself to be, you automatically kick into the "you're a racist/nazi/fascist, etc." void of any logic or thought. That said, your unsubstantiated opinions do not not constitute fact. Wise up.

In conclusion, your continued evasive cowardly stand on why this thread should be censored for no other reason than it goes against your beliefs is noted.

BTW, did you know that Einstein spent the latter part of his life trying to disprove his earlier findings simply because they went against what he came to believe from social engineering? He failed to do so because fact is not based on belief. What is, is.

 

[man]

Quote from Stealth Trader:

I could be playing devils advocate here, but you ASSume differently for no other reason than what may or may not be implied goes against the political brainwashing you are so accustomed to. No surprise there. As such, like the puppet you show yourself to be, you automatically kick into the "you're a racist/nazi/fascist, etc." void of any logic or thought. That said, your unsubstantiated opinions do not not constitute fact. Wise up.

In conclusion, your continued evasive cowardly stand on why this thread should be censored for no other reason than it goes against your beliefs is noted.

BTW, did you know that Einstein spent the latter part of his life trying to disprove his earlier findings simply because they went against what he came to believe from social engineering? He failed to do so because fact is not based on belief. What is, is.

why do you hide your beliefs in second line? why this
beating around the bush on words like "facts"
or phrases like "what is, is"? why not just say in plain
sentences what you think and believe to those "facts",
and name that "what is, is"? who is the coward here?
and please don't abuse albert einstein, a refugee for
racist reason, for your little crusade on white superiority.

you play seek and hide, making your little point without
taking real responsibility and thus avoiding the danger
of a real conflict - even if it just happens via a web forum.

so what is next? zundel? leuchter? deniarbud from utube?
oh you know them? how come?

do you realise? i'm not one of those 17year old illiterates
you can play this game with. got it?

 

[man]

but - i admit - adding's einstein's doubt on quantum mechanics
to the revisionist set of arguments ... now that is new.
brand new. and who would accuse the revisionists for
being people ever saying something ... new?

 

[james_bond_3rd]

Quote from Stealth Trader:

BTW, did you know that Einstein spent the latter part of his life trying to disprove his earlier findings simply because they went against what he came to believe from social engineering? He failed to do so because fact is not based on belief. What is, is.

This is one of the common smears against Einstein. Give me one piece of evidence that Einstein tried to "disprove his earlier findings." Which earlier findings? Relativity? Theory of photo-electric effect (for which he got the Nobel Prize)? Bose-Einstein condensation? Which one?

Einstein never believed the Coppenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics from day one, so there is no "trying to disprove his earlier findings" here either.

 

[Stealth Trader]

Quote from man:

why do you hide your beliefs in second line? why this
beating around the bush on words like "facts"
or phrases like "what is, is"? why not just say in plain
sentences what you think and believe to those "facts",
and name that "what is, is"? who is the coward here?
and please don't abuse albert einstein, a refugee for
racist reason, for your little crusade on white superiority.

you play seek and hide, making your little point without
taking real responsibility and thus avoiding the danger
of a real conflict - even if it just happens via a web forum.

so what is next? zundel? leuchter? deniarbud from utube?
oh you know them? how come?

do you realise? i'm not one of those 17year old illiterates
you can play this game with. got it?

Your continued evasive cowardly stand on why this thread should be censored for no other reason than it goes against your beliefs, notwithstanding, English is either not your first language, in which case I understand your coming across as being illiterate, or ebonics is your course of action by default. Which is it?

Back to the topic at hand, please explain why it is that you and your kind fear DNA research on race or any mention of it? Why do you and your kind spam forums with gibberish posts and try to eliminate postings that you don't like regarding race research? Could it be that you are afraid of a truth that may or may not be revealed? Seems so, as you keep running from this issue.

Furthermore, why are you ASSumming that my stand on letting the chips fall where they may automatically makes me a white supremist? Is that the best defense you can muster for your intellectually void beliefs and craven display of character? And last, but not least, how do you even know that I am even white? You appear to be coming out of the closet as a a bigoted racist with your implication that a knee-grow would never encourage scientific research on race differences, even if it meant future medical cures and a better life as a result. You are exposing yourself as a narrow minded brainwashed cretin who has been taught what to think rather than how to think. Censor anything and everything that red flags your coma induced myopic mindset.

 

[Stealth Trader]

Quote from james_bond_3rd:

This is one of the common smears against Einstein. Give me one piece of evidence that Einstein tried to "disprove his earlier findings." Which earlier findings? Relativity? Theory of photo-electric effect (for which he got the Nobel Prize)? Bose-Einstein condensation? Which one?

Einstein never believed the Coppenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics from day one, so there is no "trying to disprove his earlier findings" here either.

First, is wasn't meant as a smear. Second, as for evidence, Google is your friend. Third, unlike certain closed minded individuals posting here, prove me wrong and I'll be the first to stand corrected. Fair enough?

 

[james_bond_3rd]

Quote from Stealth Trader:

First, is wasn't meant as a smear. Second, as for evidence, Google is your friend. Third, unlike certain closed minded individuals posting here, prove me wrong and I'll be the first to stand corrected. Fair enough?

I don't mean this as a smear but you had an extramarital affair with Al Sharpton. As for evidence, Google is your friend. Unlike certain closed minded individuals posting here, prove me wrong and I'll be the first to stand corrected. Fair enough?

 

[Stealth Trader]

Quote from james_bond_3rd:

I don't mean this as a smear but you had an extramarital affair with Al Sharpton. As for evidence, Google is your friend. Unlike certain closed minded individuals posting here, prove me wrong and I'll be the first to stand corrected. Fair enough?

Ahhh, the typical "you beat your wife" response". Plenty of Google hits showing Einstein tried to disprove earlier theories, none showing your fantasy induced blather. If you were unable to prove me wrong, all you had to do was say so. No need to embarrass yourself in this manner. BTW, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Thanks!!!

 

[james_bond_3rd]

Quote from Stealth Trader:

Ahhh, the typical "you beat your wife" response". Plenty of Google hits showing Einstein tried to disprove earlier theories, none showing your fantasy induced blather. If you were unable to prove me wrong, all you had to do was say so. No need to embarrass yourself in this manner. BTW, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Thanks!!!

Amazing that you fail to see the fallacy of your argument, even after the hint I gave you. Also amazing is your inability to read. What do you think "one of common smears" mean?

You make a claim, you provide the proof. Evangelicals always get this backwards. See an UFO, if you cannot prove that it's man-made, then it must be out of this world. That's not logic.

You still don't get it? Then try the following:

I hereby claim that Einstein never tried to disprove any of his earlier works.

Now prove me wrong. Use Google if you like.

 

[MrGecko]

I have a few point to make about what this guy said:

1) If a Nobel winning scientists tells me something has been tested and shown to be true, with empirical evidence that survives significance tests, I am not inclined to disagree with him (or her, methinks I should tread carefully!).

2) IQ should not be taken out of context - I know there are Emitional *intelligence* quotations, social intelligence and entrepreneural intelligence tests as well. IQ is the most widely recognised, but should be considered along with these other measures of ability for any reasonable conclusions to be made.

3) Blacks and Whites are genetically different - it is certainly possible that, aggregated, IQ levels (mindful of point 2) are higher in one race than another. Just watch the finals of the olympics - white 100m sprinters and black 50m freesyle finalists are few and far between. This isn't racism, its an attribute that can be measured.

4) Get over it.

5) Ken Livingston is white and a fu**ing idiot.