Nobel Winner's Comments about Blacks

How do you feel about Watson's remarks?

  • Watson is dead-on accurate. Blacks are not as intelligent as whites.

    Votes: 30 35.7%
  • Watson is a racist. Intelligence is not based on race.

    Votes: 20 23.8%
  • Watson is somewhat correct. Most blacks are not as intelligent as whites.

    Votes: 27 32.1%
  • Watson is dead wrong. Blacks aren't only as smart as whites, they're smarter.

    Votes: 7 8.3%

  • Total voters
    84
Quote from TorontoTrader2:

I fail to see how social policies are dependent upon intelligence. Bascially all people desire to live in peace and have food/water/shelter - it's basic human instinct.


Most of North America and UK are unhealthy (mentally and physically), broke, TV addicts addicted to legal and illegal drugs or substances. Hardly a model to impose on others.


The rich elites are ethno-centric and support eugenics, not to mention they are violent agitators who stir up never-ending wars to meet their ends.

From your previous posts I thought, in Canada, you have it all figured out.
 
Quote from Rearden Metal:

=The only post here that makes any sense!

RM without generalization you could never learn anything, you would stay an infant mentally for the whole life.
Animals make generalizations (associations) in order to survive!

Few blacks like Thomas Sowell do not matter in large scheme of things.
 
Quote from Cesko:

RM without generalization you could never learn anything, you would stay an infant mentally for the whole life.
Animals make generalizations (associations) in order to survive!

Few blacks like Thomas Sowell do not matter in large scheme of things.

All generalizations are false. :D
 
Question for those who buy into the 'Blacks are a sub-race' nonsense: How do you explain the fact that throughout most of recorded history, whites were the barbarians, and various dark-skinned people were culturally and scientifically superior?

I have no illusions about the current U.S. sociological situation. I'd much rather have my car break down in an all-white U.S. neighborhood than an all-black one (anyone claiming otherwise is a liar)... but supposed 'genetic inferiority' has absolutely nothing to do with that. With the right cultural and societal changes, in under a hundred years time I could easily envision a future world where black crime rates are far lower than among whites.

Anyone familiar with "Lord of the Flies"? We're <b>all</b> inherently violent savages underneath it all. Some cultures are just (temporarily) better than others at muzzling humanity's innate barbarism.
 
Quote from jamjob_ramjet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rN2VqFPNS8w

now, what part of this song had more beauty

Beathovan's original part, nearly 200 years ago, or 'T Mike''s recent addition?

this video contains messages ordinary given to white kindergartners, and the messenger cant do it without expletives

Are you saying you weren't able to recognize the fact that the entire video was intended as a joke?

Read an interview, read an interview, read a motherfuckin' interview:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy.../11/21/AR2007112102491.html?nav=rss_education

" 'Read a Book' was a joke from the beginning," he says. "It was more about parodying the state of hip-hop."

"Armah knows he is on shaky ground with some of the lyrics, but says he was trying to stick with the formula: make the song as ridiculous as possible to imitate the ridiculousness of many rap songs. He enlisted teenagers to plug in lyrics that they thought would work -- and also be funny -- to drive home the point of positive behavior, and they came up with "brush yo' teeth" and "wear deodorant."
 
Quote from Rearden Metal:

Question for those who buy into the 'Blacks are a sub-race' nonsense: How do you explain the fact that throughout most of recorded history, whites were the barbarians, and various dark-skinned people were culturally and scientifically superior?

So you are saying that whites were cannibals and not Africans?

And whites were throwing spears when Africans were being Bach and Beethoven?

Africans created planes? Cars? Anything but warring with and eating each other?
 
Quote from version77:

So you are saying that whites were cannibals and not Africans?

And whites were throwing spears when Africans were being Bach and Beethoven?

Africans created planes? Cars? Anything but warring with and eating each other?
no. it is more detailed and more precise what he is saying: you
are dumb and you are right now proving it.
 
Quote from Rearden Metal:

Question for those who buy into the 'Blacks are a sub-race' nonsense: How do you explain the fact that throughout most of recorded history, whites were the barbarians, and various dark-skinned people were culturally and scientifically superior?
thank you very much. that sums it up best. but unfortunately
especially the american part of this planet's white population still
believes that martha stewart and brad pitt are the summit of
human development ...

maybe, just maybe, the US and the whites are right now just those
who have the say on this planet. and maybe, just maybe, the
romans, the chinese, the japanese, the indians and so forth
thought the same about "inferior" races when it was them to
rule. and africans btw did the same. certain tribes refer to
others as "humans" only for members of their own tribe. sounds
all too familiar, doesn't it? .... and, yhea, remember that little swastica
party in germany, that studied in great detail how FAR superior we
as whites are. i am mixig things here, do you say? oh really? do i ...
 
Quote from man:

thank you very much. that sums it up best. but unfortunately
especially the american part of this planet's white population still
believes that martha stewart and brad pitt are the summit of
human development ...

maybe, just maybe, the US and the whites are right now just those
who have the say on this planet. and maybe, just maybe, the
romans, the chinese, the japanese, the indians and so forth
thought the same about "inferior" races when it was them to
rule. and africans btw did the same. certain tribes refer to
others as "humans" only for members of their own tribe. sounds
all too familiar, doesn't it? .... and, yhea, remember that little swastica
party in germany, that studied in great detail how FAR superior we
as whites are. i am mixig things here, do you say? oh really? do i ...


actually, invoking Godwin's law, you just lost the arguement
 
Quote from Rearden Metal:

Question for those who buy into the 'Blacks are a sub-race' nonsense: How do you explain the fact that throughout most of recorded history, whites were the barbarians, and various dark-skinned people were culturally and scientifically superior?

I have no illusions about the current U.S. sociological situation. I'd much rather have my car break down in an all-white U.S. neighborhood than an all-black one (anyone claiming otherwise is a liar)... but supposed 'genetic inferiority' has absolutely nothing to do with that. With the right cultural and societal changes, in under a hundred years time I could easily envision a future world where black crime rates are far lower than among whites.

Anyone familiar with "Lord of the Flies"? We're <b>all</b> inherently violent savages underneath it all. Some cultures are just (temporarily) better than others at muzzling humanity's innate barbarism.

You mean the way that the Egyptians were culturally and scientifically superior to the Jews?

Sorry, I don't look to the "lord of the flies" for insight into human behavior. I think there are more credible sources.
 
Back
Top