No1Trader.com domain for sale

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sig said:
Good example even if he didn't own that specific one. Back in 1998, no-one really knew or understood how the internet worked and we didn't have good search engines people would actually randomly type "pets.com" into their browser if they wanted to find out something about pets. Company's had mad VC money they were throwing at what later turned out to be positively horrible ideas and the few people who had snapped up domain names were able to sell them to the pets.com's of the world for crazy amounts. Flash forward two years to 2000 and pets.com is bankrupt. Flash forward 20 years to today and pets.com is a site making money because of the brand and fact they sell pet supplies and while their domain is part of their brand it's not what they earn their revenue from. I can tell you that No1Pets.com is worth exactly nothing on it's own, nor any other variation on pets.com. It's not 1999 any more, domains that haven't already had a brand built around them are on their own worthless and everyone knows it.
The ultimate irony is the the most recognizable and arguably valuable URL in the world is a made-up word derived from the word for 10^100, or as we know it today, google.com.
More...

whitehouse.com !!!!
 
Sig said:
Good example even if he didn't own that specific one. Back in 1998, no-one really knew or understood how the internet worked and we didn't have good search engines people would actually randomly type "pets.com" into their browser if they wanted to find out something about pets. Company's had mad VC money they were throwing at what later turned out to be positively horrible ideas and the few people who had snapped up domain names were able to sell them to the pets.com's of the world for crazy amounts. Flash forward two years to 2000 and pets.com is bankrupt. Flash forward 20 years to today and pets.com is a site making money because of the brand and fact they sell pet supplies and while their domain is part of their brand it's not what they earn their revenue from. I can tell you that No1Pets.com is worth exactly nothing on it's own, nor any other variation on pets.com. It's not 1999 any more, domains that haven't already had a brand built around them are on their own worthless and everyone knows it.
The ultimate irony is the the most recognizable and arguably valuable URL in the world is a made-up word derived from the word for 10^100, or as we know it today, google.com.
More...

Thanks. I do know that nearly every domain name he sold or parked is a single word domain.
 
Southampton said:
Not heard this much nonsense since the last meeting of "workers unite" in shanghai.
More...

What a well-crafted counter argument. Anyway, this reaction makes me curious: where do you draw the line between speculation on a Picasso painting, and price gouging on a life-saving product (i.e. Martin Shkreli)? Do you make a distinction between the two or should there, in your view, be no restrictions to pure supply and demand?

I think one of the perks of living in an organized society (as opposed to pure anarchy) is specifically that we agree on common rules. Regulating the markets of essential services to maximize their availability, for example. There's quite a leap from there to socialism, if that's what you're hinting at.
 
VPhantom said:
What a well-crafted counter argument. Anyway, this reaction makes me curious: where do you draw the line between speculation on a Picasso painting, and price gouging on a life-saving product (i.e. Martin Shkreli)? Do you make a distinction between the two or should there, in your view, be no restrictions to pure supply and demand?

I think one of the perks of living in an organized society (as opposed to pure anarchy) is specifically that we agree on common rules. Regulating the markets of essential services to maximize their availability, for example. There's quite a leap from there to socialism, if that's what you're hinting at.
More...


I am an anarchocapitalist so we will have to agree to disagree but that's cool--- i can see your point.

Peace & love,

Hampton
 
Internet Marketing 101 ...... You are lacking. Obviously.
How would your read this NO1(No One) or NO1(number 1)? Totally agree with irritating double meaning and does not rhyme at all. Oh, by the way, you are trying to sell something that will never be used as a team or a group because it is limited to 1 and trader. Who would want to open an organization to have 1 trader. I think you better off advertising it as NO ONE trader and make a story behind it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top