It seems like he has no opinion, no comment, and no argument.
His job is only to COPY from SOME HEALTH website, then PASTE it in ET HEALTH THREAD.
No, Traditional Chinese Medicine Has Not Been Vindicated by Science
- Thread starter Frederick Foresight
- Start date
His job is only to COPY from SOME HEALTH website, then PASTE it in ET HEALTH THREAD.
I generally copy and paste what I believe, unless I say otherwise. Do you expect me to express the point better than the author?
Because they are never wrong. It is called appeal to authority.
I am still waiting for the in depth, 13000 studies refuting EACH of the Chinese traditional practices. Make it 12999, you don't have to refute using bear bile.
No, but when there is valid criticism, I expect you to debate it.
Go to my post in the earlier thread. There is a discussion on the topic there where I express my opinion.
The debate is long over. Get over it.
She didn't ask you to accept her word. She cites studies and facts that refute the whole premise. But you're too special to read it.
Last edited:
Nah. Also I don't know if you realize but from time to time I put you on Ignore, for obvious reasons.
Reality?Nah. Also I don't know if you realize but from time to time I put you on Ignore, for obvious reasons.
Any actual trader knows you always find patterns "big data", nearly all spurious correlations.
Proteins, sounds like good juju.
Proteins, sounds like good juju.
Last edited:
TCM can't be in this as they would have killed the monkey for body parts that are attributed with medicinal properties.
