Who the fuck is your NWO climate division?
No Rise of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Fraction in Past 160 Years, New Research Finds
- Thread starter drjekyllus
- Start date
Who the fuck is your NWO climate division?
Another play from the leftist playbook. This deals with global warming.
Step 1. Make a bunch of baseless and bogus predictions that paint doomsday scenerios due to global warming.
Step 2. Demand extreme government intervention into the lives of everyday citizens in order to prevent the diaster.
Step 3. Hope the climate actually cooperates with you.
Step 4. When the climate does not cooperate, claim that Global Warming is actually going to make the temp colder.
Step 5. Accuse anyone who points out your bogus predictions as working for Exxon Mobile.
Step 6. If your email gets hacked and people want to know why you were trying to "hide the decline", claim that the email was taken completely out of context.
Step 1. Make a bunch of baseless and bogus predictions that paint doomsday scenerios due to global warming.
Step 2. Demand extreme government intervention into the lives of everyday citizens in order to prevent the diaster.
Step 3. Hope the climate actually cooperates with you.
Step 4. When the climate does not cooperate, claim that Global Warming is actually going to make the temp colder.
Step 5. Accuse anyone who points out your bogus predictions as working for Exxon Mobile.
Step 6. If your email gets hacked and people want to know why you were trying to "hide the decline", claim that the email was taken completely out of context.
So bigdavediode, can you define a "climate critic"? Is that someone who is critical of the climate?
If reading the abstract is too hard, an unbiased commentary can be found here:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Is-...f-anthropogenic-CO2-emissions-increasing.html
Quote from dcraig:
If reading the abstract is too hard, an unbiased commentary can be found here:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Is-...f-anthropogenic-CO2-emissions-increasing.html
Great graph. We have covered the fact the CO2 levels are a LAGGING indicator of temp, not the other way around. This has been covered countless times on this forum, but the left still is trying to pretend it has never been covered. Nice try though.
It sounds like someone who is critical of the behavior of the climate, as if their opinion changes it.
Nope. Natural CO2 levels lag temp. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions cause temperature change.
So temp reacts differently to different CO2? Interesting. And absolute rubbish.
Nope. CO2 contributes to a feedback mechanism. It absorbs heat (ie. contributes to global warming) and is also emitted from ground sources during periods of higher temperature.
So the more CO2 humans put into the atmosphere, the more that the land itself will emit, therefore it both leads temperature change and that temperature change also causes natural emissions.
LOL. Your response is priceless.
It lags by 800-2500 years so I guess we don't really have anything to worry about since it takes 800 to 2500 years. We will be out of fossil fuel by then so it doesnt matter anyway.
Second of all, if it is a feedback, how come the temp also leads CO2 changes when it gets colder. According to your model, the CO2 should trap the heat preventing the Earth from cooling.
What is your NWO climate division that you speak so highly of?