No one on EliteTrader will beat the market… here is why

Quote from gbos:

Markets are not efficient

But who honestly cares whether markets are efficient, random, closed loop or any other buzz word.

Who really cares .......

I imagine those who care, are the people who do not understand how to trade consistently profitably.
There must be a reason other than themselves.

regards
f9
 
not one field can offer the opportunities to make so much with so little effort. Can you lose it? sure...but you also have the opportunity to make it...wether it be luck, skill or edge.
 
Quote from gbos:

Markets are not efficient but it takes a lot of work to earn that extra 1% return.
Buffett long term returns …. Index + 10% per year
Graham long term returns …. Index + 2% per year
If it was easy to achieve 20% returns on capital over a 20 year period forbes 400 would be full of stock market investors/traders.

20% for a trader is a completely different proposition to 20% for an investor.
 
Why begrudge others if they win in trading? Why does it hurt to see others do good?

Another example besides traders is the current auto talks and forcing the auto companies into BK for the main purpose to kill the UAW. Many fail to look into a mirror and ask themself why they want to see workers who are members of a union lose out. I might be able to help those folks with a few short words about what they would see if they looked in the mirror to answer the question why they have a problem with union workers.

First reason is jealousy, thats the easy one, many begrudge union workers because they could not get in and enjoy the wages, benefits etc. That is a givin.

The second group that can not stand to see union members get a fair shake is the so called college educated group of whiners. This group prefers to chastise the unions, the union members, the union members famlies and the unionised companies themselves. Why?

Because the college, priviledged, brat, snob group feel organized labor bestows unfair higher wages, benefits, working conditions upon a group of lower class, less deserving workers than the workers deserve. The college etc class believe their built in "ADVANTAGE" over others is lessoned by organized labor. In a nutshell the college, snob class feel less superior because of organized labor. Thus they resent organized labor.

PS: I am being kind to the snob, brat class because it is after all the Holiday season. Look in the mirror and be honest with yourself as you see who is that person in the mirror.
 
Quote from forsalenyc:

not just on ET....no one on planet can beat the mkt

You have obviously put a great deal of thought into this one.

Just as a passing thought.

"Elite" means superior, the best of the best.
And 'Trader" means, well trader means to Trade.

Nowhere in the website heading do I read "Whiner or Loser"
So, why is this site populated predominantly by non Elite People.

Solve this question and you will be on your path to success.

regards
f9
 
Quote from neutrino:

I posted some of my thoughts on another thread on why you can’t make any money from speculation (above the normal long-term return for stocks), but I didn’t get challenged so I decided to post this in a separate thread.

I’ve been trading for a couple of years now, but only a week ago I finally realized that the academics are actually right and markets are efficient enough so that no short-term profits can be extracted from them on a consistent basis. Since then I stopped trading. To continue trading I need to convincingly disprove this hypothesis, or just accept it and put my money in an index fund and get a job or start a real business. So I hope on some feedback from you guys to help me and I hope we can make a discussion and challenge the very basis of our belief systems as traders – that we can beat the market.

Please have some patience and read at least the first two paragraphs below :)

***

There is no edge in trading and speculation. In a perfectly competitive market as is the stock market, the expected economic profit is ZERO, i.e. you cannot earn more than the normal return for the security you are trading without taking additional risk. This means that if you are a stock trader (or equity futures trader) you are expected to earn about 8% nominal return or about 6% real return (after inflation). You will also have to subtract trading costs from the normal return, so in effect you can expect to earn less than the normal return.

In markets which are not perfectly competitive (such as venture capital, real estate) you can still earn zero return above the normal return for these markets, but YOUR SKILL, INTELLIGENCE, EXPERIENCE and TIME INVESTED, will have a much bigger impact on your results than in a perfectly competitive market. Your skill and brains will count most (to a point where even dumb people can have spectacular results) where there is almost no competition or where you somehow manage to protect your business - with a brand (Nescafe), a patent (Pfizer), network effects (Microsoft, eBay), scale (Wall-Mart), addictive product (Coke, Phillip Morris) etc... That's a true edge. You have no edge buying and selling stocks - every information is publicly available and easily obtainable (including the price history!!!), your stock is no different than any one else's and you have a transparent, continuous auction process with tens of millions of buyers and sellers, no barriers to entry and a tiny spread. Your IQ, discipline and nervous system simply don't matter in such market. Whatever profits from inefficiencies there are, they are divided into millions of pieces between your competitors. The only true edge you can obtain is if you manage to buy at the bid and sell at the ask, because the fair price is in between - so effectively you buy below the fair price and sell above it. And also stay diversified, because you can earn a free lunch from undiversified investors, if there are any.


A lot of people think that if they are really smart, and hard working and disciplined and creative in their regular life, in school or in their non-trading job experience, they will have a similar results in the stock market and should be at the top of the game. But there is one crucial difference between the stock market and the normal environment we grow up with. If you are smart and work hard, indeed you have a very high chance of beating the next guy. But that chance quickly erodes when you put your skill and time in a perfectly competitive market. Imagine your chances of success playing poker against a single opponent. Let's say they are 99% against an unknown opponent. Now imagine playing at a table with 100 unknown opponents. The rules of the game will have to be changed somehow, there must be more cards in the deck etc., but the idea is that your edge (strategy, discipline, emotional control etc...) will rapidly vanish. No longer will you be able to track the behavior of your opponents and there will be no point in that because each one of them will have a negligible effect on the game. Your profit will be closer to the expected profit for all the players on the table, i.e. zero minus the rake for the casino. Everything will be determined by chance and not skill any more. The probability of leaving the table last with all the money is much lower than 99% now even though you are still the same player. If such game existed no one will want to play it, they'd rather go to the roulette. Traders and investors however are constantly bombarded with success stories and "new" information to trade so that they stay in the game and make commissions for Wall Street.

Think about it - no one with brains will go into a very, very competitive market such as retailers or groceries stores. But they rush toward the stock market, which is much more competitive (only the bond market is more efficient actually).

Many traders believe they have a system that has a mathematical edge. The truth is that their system HAD a mathematical edge, but it has a built-in systematic risk because the odds are very, very high that this system is already discovered or will be discovered soon enough to erode its profit margins and bring its return back to 10% adjusted for risk minus commissions. The nature of the market always changes as long as there are people to look at it, so it is in a constant evolutionary state that is completely unpredictable. Back testing is always curve-fitting by definition and is especially dangerous when applied to publicly available information.


AAAAAHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHA

HAHA

HAHA
 
Quote from neutrino:

That there is a majority of consistent losing traders in the market (say for 10-20 years) if you add back the trading related costs like commissions and fees (which are profits for brokers and not for other traders).

do you have comprehensive stats on all your trading?
 
Quote from neutrino:

This means that if you are a stock trader (or equity futures trader) you are expected to earn about 8% nominal return or about 6% real return (after inflation).
Without responding to the rest of your original post, the above part stood out for me...you seem to be assuming that stock/equity futures traders only trade on the long side - an obvious false assumption. Did I misunderstand you?
 
Back
Top