No collusion

CaptainObvious

CaptainObvious

WASHINGTON — The Republican-led House intelligence committee on Friday officially declared the end of its Russia probe, saying in its final report that it found no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in the 2016 presidential race.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-in-russia-probe/ar-AAwq8xu?OCID=ansmsnnews11

Peace looms imminent on the Korean Peninsula.

Another lefty journalist gets the sex scandal hose today.

Tough day for democrats.
 
CaptainObvious said:
WASHINGTON — The Republican-led House intelligence committee on Friday officially declared the end of its Russia probe, saying in its final report that it found no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in the 2016 presidential race.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-in-russia-probe/ar-AAwq8xu?OCID=ansmsnnews11

Peace looms imminent on the Korean Peninsula.

Another lefty journalist gets the sex scandal hose today.

Tough day for democrats.
More...
Tough year. 6+ more to go.
 
WeToddDid2 said:
Yeah, there were no dems on the committee.
More...
The report's conclusion is fiercely opposed by committee Democrats, who say the committee did not interview enough witnesses or gather enough evidence to support its finding. The investigation began with bipartisan promise but ultimately succumbed to factional squabbling.
 
Tony Stark said:
The report's conclusion is fiercely opposed by committee Democrats, who say the committee did not interview enough witnesses or gather enough evidence to support its finding. The investigation began with bipartisan promise but ultimately succumbed to factional squabbling.
More...

Bbbut Comey was able to conclude that the Hillary matter wasn't going to result in charges. You know after investigating it for what 18 months an investigator knows where it will land.

Did not interview enough? Comey also indicated that's not necessary if you are a competent investigator.

Funny how it's always different for the Dems.
 
LOL.jpg
 
They are so fixated on the word collusion .


Here is why the Russian lawyer from the Trump Tower meeting suddenly changed her story


don-trump-jr.jpg

Natalia Veselnitskaya, one of the key figures in the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting held by top members of the Trump campaign in an effort to get dirt on Hillary Clinton, originally told Congress that she was a private lawyer without ties to the government.

The New York Times reported Friday, however, that Veselnitskaya misled Congress and the American people when she testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee last November that she works “independently of any governmental bodies.” The Times found evidence that had previously worked with Russia’s chief legal office, and she later confirmed she was an “informant” for the government.

One of the reporters who helped break the story, Sharon LaFraniere, went on CNN Friday night and explained how she changed her story.
“She was a little bit taken by surprise because we and NBC News obtained a series of emails exchanges between her and the Russian prosecutor general,” LaFraniere said. “An NBC News correspondent chased her down in Moscow — and she just blurted it out when she was asked: ‘What’s your relationship with the prosecutor general?’

“She said, ‘Well, I have a dual role, I’m a private attorney and I’m an informant.’ From there on, she backtracked.”

Separately, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said on MSNBC that even this word was misleading. “She’s a spy,” he said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top